...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of pharmacy practice >'Pimping' in Pharmacy Education: A Survey and Comparison of Student and Faculty Views
【24h】

'Pimping' in Pharmacy Education: A Survey and Comparison of Student and Faculty Views

机译:“Pimping”在药房教育:学生和教师观的调查与比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: "Pimping" is an informal teaching technique that is widely used in medical education. Pimping is characterized by questioning the learner with the intent of reinforcing clinical hierarchy. To date, there are no studies of the use of pimping in pharmacy education. Objectives: To describe the use of pimping as a teaching method in pharmacy education and to compare student and faculty perceptions of this technique. Methods: Faculty and fourth-year PharmD (P4) students from 2 colleges of pharmacy were invited to participate in a survey about experiences and perceptions of pimping. Faculty and P4 surveys each contained up to 17 items to assess personal experiences, utilization, perceived risks and benefits, and preferences regarding the role of the technique in pharmacy education. Results: The response rate was 49.5% (159 of 321). Of faculty, 74.1 % reported they had been pimped in their training, but less than half (45.8%) use pimping themselves. Similarly, 73.7% of students reported that they had been pimped at some time in their pharmacy education. Students nearly equally viewed their experiences as positive (35.3%) versus negative (38.2%). Responses were similar between faculty and students recommending that the method should be avoided entirely (P = .259), used sparingly (P = .072), or used consistently (P = .309). Perceived benefits and risks of pimping were similar between faculty and students, but there were many differences in rationales offered by faculty versus students' perceived rationales. Conclusion: Pimping is common in pharmacy education and its use is controversial. The perceived rationale for use of pimping differs, which may undermine student/faculty relationships.
机译:背景:“PIMPing”是一种非正式的教学技术,广泛用于医学教育。 PIMPing的特点是用促进临床等级的意图来提问学习者。迄今为止,没有关于PIMPY在药房教育中使用的研究。目标:描述PIMPID作为药房教育的教学方法,并比较了对这种技术的学生和教师的看法。方法:邀请来自2学院的教师和第四年的药物(P4)学生参加了关于PIMPy的经验和看法的调查。教师和P4调查各自包含最多17个项目,以评估个人经验,利用,感知的风险和福利,以及关于该技术在药房教育中的作用的偏好。结果:响应率为49.5%(第159条,共321名)。教师,74.1%报告他们在培训中被PIMPPED,但不到一半(45.8%)使用PIMPyper。同样,73.7%的学生报告说,他们在药房教育中一直被关押。学生几乎与阳性(35.3%)相反的经验(38.2%)。教师和学生之间的响应相似,建议完全避免该方法(p = .259),谨慎使用(p = .072),或一致地使用(p = .309)。教师和学生之间的感知益处和幽灵风险是相似的,但教师与学生的感知理由提供了许多差异。结论:Pimping在药房教育中很常见,其使用是有争议的。使用PIMPy的感知理由不同,可能会破坏学生/教师的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号