首页> 外文期刊>Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. >Randomised clinical trial: Sodium alginate oral suspension is non-inferior to omeprazole in the treatment of patients with non-erosive gastroesophageal disease
【24h】

Randomised clinical trial: Sodium alginate oral suspension is non-inferior to omeprazole in the treatment of patients with non-erosive gastroesophageal disease

机译:随机临床试验:海藻酸钠口服混悬液在治疗非侵蚀性胃食管疾病患者中不逊于奥美拉唑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background The burden of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is increasing in the Asia area and the majority of GERD patients have non-erosive reflux disease (NERD). Aim To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sodium alginate suspension compared to omeprazole in adult subjects with NERD. Methods In this 4-week, double-blind, parallel study, 195 NERD subjects were randomised to one of two treatment groups: sodium alginate suspension 20 mL three times a day and omeprazole 20 mg once daily. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage of patients achieving adequate heartburn or regurgitation relief at day 28 assessed by patient diary. The secondary efficacy endpoints included percentage of patients achieving adequate heartburn or regurgitation relief, change from baseline of the Reflux Disease Questionnaire total score at day 14 and 28 from baseline, and patients' overall satisfaction. Results In this study, 183 subjects were included in the intent-to-treat population, and 172 subjects were included in the per-protocol population. Non-inferiority of sodium alginate to omeprazole was demonstrated in the intent-to-treat population [difference, 2.7% (53.3% vs. 50.5%, P = 0.175), 95% lower confidence interval -11.9%, above the preset margin of -19%]. All of the secondary efficacy endpoints were comparable between two groups. The incidence of adverse event was relatively low and there was no difference between the two groups (5.4% vs. 5.5% for sodium alginate vs. omeprazole). No severe adverse event was noted in this study. Conclusion The study showed that sodium alginate was as effective as omeprazole for symptomatic relief in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01338077).
机译:背景技术在亚洲地区,胃食管反流病(GERD)的负担正在增加,大多数GERD患者患有非糜烂性反流病(NERD)。目的评估海藻酸钠混悬液与奥美拉唑相比在成年NERD患者中的疗效和安全性。方法在为期4周的双盲平行研究中,将195名NERD受试者随机分为两个治疗组之一:海藻酸钠混悬液每天20次,每次3次,奥美拉唑,每日一次20毫克。主要功效终点是通过患者日记评估的在第28天获得足够的胃灼热或反流缓解的患者百分比。次要疗效终点包括达到适当的胃灼热或反流缓解的患者百分比,与基线相比第14天和第28天的反流疾病问卷总评分基线的变化以及患者的总体满意度。结果在本研究中,意向性治疗人群包括183名受试者,按协议人群包括172名受试者。在意向治疗人群中证明了海藻酸钠对奥美拉唑的不劣效性[差异,2.7%(53.3%比50.5%,P = 0.175),置信区间-11.9%降低95%,高于预设的裕度。 -19%]。两组之间所有次要功效终点均相当。不良事件的发生率相对较低,两组之间没有差异(海藻酸钠与奥美拉唑的发生率分别为5.4%和5.5%)。在这项研究中没有发现严重的不良事件。结论该研究表明,海藻酸钠与奥美拉唑在非侵蚀性反流性疾病患者的症状缓解方面一样有效(Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01338077)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号