...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >DOES INTRASESSION CONCURRENT STRENGTH AND AEROBIC TRAINING ORDER INFLUENCE TRAINING-INDUCED EXPLOSIVE STRENGTH AND (V) over dotO(2)MAX IN PREPUBESCENT CHILDREN?
【24h】

DOES INTRASESSION CONCURRENT STRENGTH AND AEROBIC TRAINING ORDER INFLUENCE TRAINING-INDUCED EXPLOSIVE STRENGTH AND (V) over dotO(2)MAX IN PREPUBESCENT CHILDREN?

机译:杂交是否正常和好氧训练命令会影响培训诱导的爆炸性强度和(v)在前促儿童中的DOTO(2)最大值?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The aim of this study was to analyze the interference of strength and aerobic training order over an 8-week period on explosive skills and maximal oxygen uptake ((V) over dotO(2)max) in prepubescent children. One hundred twenty-eight prepubescent children aged 10-11 years (10.9 +/- 0.5 years) were randomly selected and assigned to 1 of the 3 groups: intrasession concurrent aerobic before (GAS: n = 39) or after strength training (GSA: n = 45) or control group (GC: n = 44; no training program). The GC maintained their baseline level performance, and training-induced differences were found in the experimental groups. Increases were found in the 1-kg and 3-kg medicine ball throws: GAS: + 3%, + 5.5%, p <= 0.05, p < 0.001; GSA: +5.7%, + 8.7%, p < 0.001, respectively; in the counter movement jump height and standing long jump length: GAS: +6.5%, +3.4%, p <= 0.05; GSA: +7%, +4.5%, p < 0.001, respectively; in the 20-m shuttle-run time: GAS: +2.3%; GSA: +4.6%, p < 0.001; and, in the (V) over dotO(2)max: GAS: +7.3%, p < 0.001; GSA: +3.8%, p < 0.001 from pretraining to post-training. All programs were effective, but GSA produced better results than GAS for muscle strength variables, and GAS produced better results than GSA for aerobic capacity variables. The present study explored an unknown issue and added useful information to the literature in this area. These training methods should be taken into consideration to optimize explosive strength and cardiorespiratory fitness training in school-based programs and sports club programs.
机译:本研究的目的是通过在前促儿童中分析8周内的8周的时间和最大氧气摄取((v)的最大氧气吸收((v))的干扰。随机选择1000例10八岁的前燃料儿童(10.9 +/- 0.5岁),并分配给3组中的1组:血液血液:n = 39)或实力培训(GSA: n = 45)或对照组(GC:n = 44;没有培训计划)。 GC维持其基线水平性能,实验组中发现了培训诱导的差异。在1公斤和3公斤药球中发现增加:气体:+ 3%,+ 5.5%,P <= 0.05,P <0.001; GSA:+ 5.7%,+ 8.7%,P <0.001;在反运动跳跃高度和延长跳跃长度:气体:+ 6.5%,+ 3.4%,P <= 0.05; GSA:+ 7%,+ 4.5%,P <0.001分别;在20米的班车运行时间:天然气:+ 2.3%; GSA:+ 4.6%,P <0.001;并且,在(v)上(2)Max:Gas:+ 7.3%,P <0.001; GSA:+ 3.8%,P <0.001从预先训练到训练后。所有程序都是有效的,但GSA产生的结果比肌肉强度变量的气体更好,而气体产生的结果比GSA更好,以获得有氧能力变量。本研究探讨了一个未知问题,并为该领域的文献添加了有用的信息。应考虑这些培训方法,以优化基于校本计划和体育俱乐部计划的爆炸性强度和心肺功能健身培训。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号