首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >Comparing the Immediate Effects of a Total Motion Release Warm-up and a Dynamic Warm-up Protocol on the Dominant Shoulder in Baseball Athletes
【24h】

Comparing the Immediate Effects of a Total Motion Release Warm-up and a Dynamic Warm-up Protocol on the Dominant Shoulder in Baseball Athletes

机译:比较总体运动释放预热的直接影响和棒球运动员主导肩部的动态预热协议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Gamma, SC, Baker, R, May, J, Seegmiller, JG, Nasypany, A, and Iorio, SM. Comparing the immediate effects of a total motion release warm-up and a dynamic warm-up protocol on the dominant shoulder in baseball athletes. J Strength Cond Res 34(5): 1362-1368, 2020-A decrease in total range of motion (ROM) of the dominant shoulder may predispose baseball athletes to increased shoulder injury risk; the most effective technique for improving ROM is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the immediate effects of Total Motion Release (TMR) to a generic dynamic warm-up program in baseball athletes. Baseball athletes (n = 20) were randomly assigned to an intervention group: TMR group (TMRG; n = 10) or traditional warm-up group (TWG; n = 10). Shoulder ROM measurements were recorded for internal rotation (IR) and external rotation (ER), the intervention was applied, and postmeasurements were recorded. Each group then received the other intervention and postmeasurements were again recorded. The time main effect (p <= 0.001) and the time x group interaction effect were significant (p <= 0.001) for IR and ER. Post hoc analysis revealed that TMR produced significant increases in mean IR (p <= 0.005, d = 1.52) and ER (p <= 0.018, d = 1.22) of the dominant shoulder initially. When groups crossed-over, the TMRG experienced a decrease in mean IR and ER after the dynamic warm-up, whereas the TWG experienced a significant increase in mean IR (p <= 0.001, d = 3.08) and ER (p <= 0.001, d = 2.56) after TMR intervention. Total Motion Release increased IR and ER of the dominant shoulder more than a dynamic warm-up. Dynamic warm-up after TMR also resulted in decreased IR and ER; however, TMR after dynamic warm-up significantly improved IR and ER. Based on these results, TMR is more effective than a generic dynamic warm-up for improving dominant shoulder ROM in baseball players.
机译:Gamma,SC,Baker,R,May,J,Seegmiller,JG,鼻腔,A和Iorio,SM。比较总运动释放预热的直接影响和棒球运动员主导肩部的动态预热协议。 J强度COND RES 34(5):1362-1368,2020-a主导肩部的运动量(ROM)的总范围减少可以使棒球运动员提高肩部伤害风险;改善ROM最有效的技术是未知的。本研究的目的是将总运动释放(TMR)的直接影响与棒球运动员的通用动态预热程序进行比较。棒球运动员(n = 20)被随机分配给干预组:TMR组(TMRG; n = 10)或传统的预热组(TWG; n = 10)。记录肩部ROM测量用于内部旋转(IR)和外部旋转(ER),施用干预,并记录了后释放。然后每组接受其他干预,并再次记录了课后。 IR和ER的时间主要效果(P <= 0.001)和时间X组相互作用效应是显着的(P <= 0.001)。后HOC分析显示,最初,TMR产生的显着增加(P <= 0.005,D = 1.52)和ER(P <= 0.018,D = 1.22)。当横跨跨越时,TMRG在动态预热后的平均值IR和ER的情况下经历了均值的减少,而TWG在平均值的平均值增加(P <= 0.001,D = 3.08)和ER(P <= 0.001) TMR干预后,D = 2.56)。总运动释放增加了IR和ER的主导肩部超过动态预热。 TMR后的动态预热也导致IR和ER减少;但是,动态预热后的TMR显着改善了IR和ER。基于这些结果,TMR比在棒球运动员中改善主导肩部rom的通用动态热身更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号