...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of critical care >Outcomes of care managed by an acute care nurse practitioner/attending physician team in a subacute medical intensive care unit.
【24h】

Outcomes of care managed by an acute care nurse practitioner/attending physician team in a subacute medical intensive care unit.

机译:亚急性医疗重症监护室的急诊护士执业医师/主治医师小组管理的护理结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Many academic medical centers employ nurse practitioners as substitutes to provide care normally supplied by house staff. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes in a subacute medical intensive care unit of patients managed by a team consisting of either an acute care nurse practitioner and an attending physician or an attending physician and critical care/pulmonary fellows. METHODS: During a 31-month period, in 7-month blocks of time, 526 consecutive patients admitted to the unit for more than 24 hours were managed by one or the other of the teams. Patients managed by the 2 teams were compared for a variety of outcomes. RESULTS: Patients managed by the 2 teams did not differ significantly for any workload, demographic, or medical condition variable. The patients also did not differ in readmission to the high acuity unit (P = .25) or subacute unit (P = .44) within 72 hours of discharge or in mortality with (P = .25) or without (P = .89) treatment limitations. Among patients who had multiple weaning trials, patients managed by the 2 teams did not differ in length of stay in the subacute unit (P = .42), duration of mechanical ventilation (P = .18), weaning status at time of discharge from the unit (P = .80), or disposition (P = .28). Acute Physiology Scores were significantly different over time (P = .046). Patients managed by the fellows had more reintubations (P=.02). CONCLUSIONS: In a subacute intensive care unit, management by the 2 teams produced equivalent outcomes.
机译:背景:许多学术医疗中心都聘用护士从业人员来替代通常由家庭工作人员提供的护理。目的:比较亚急性医疗重症监护室中由急诊护士执业医师和主治医师或主治医师和重症监护/肺部疾病专家组成的团队管理的患者的结局。方法:在31个月的7个月内,由一个小组或另一个小组管理了526名连续入院超过24小时的患者。比较两个小组管理的患者的各种结局。结果:2个团队管理的患者在任何工作量,人口统计学或医疗状况变量方面均无显着差异。患者出院72小时内再次入院至高敏眼科病房(P = .25)或亚急性病房(P = .44)或有或无(P = .25)(P = .89)的死亡率无差异)治疗的局限性。在进行多次断奶试验的患者中,由两个小组管理的患者在亚急性病房的住院时间(P = 0.42),机械通气时间(P = .18),出院时的断奶状态没有差异。单位(P = .80)或处置(P = .28)。急性生理学评分随时间变化显着(P = .046)。由同伴管理的患者有更多的再次插管(P = .02)。结论:在亚急性重症监护病房中,两个团队的管理产生了相同的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号