首页> 外文期刊>Journal of ethnobiology >THE HUMAN FACTOR: ECOLOGICAL SALIENCE IN ORNITHOLOGY AND ETHNO-ORNITHOLOGY
【24h】

THE HUMAN FACTOR: ECOLOGICAL SALIENCE IN ORNITHOLOGY AND ETHNO-ORNITHOLOGY

机译:人类因素:鸟类学中的生态突变和血管鸟类学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

At the heart of the interplay between names and knowledge is the relative salience of different taxa. Hunn (1999) described four, semi-overlapping kinds of salience: phenotypic, perceptual, cultural, and ecological. While the first three are well documented, ecological salience remains largely hypothetical in the literature. In this paper, I test Hunn's concept of ecological salience by reference to 3186 recorded English folk-names of British birds. The numbers of names recorded across 57 species represented in this study range from two (Nightingale [Luscinia megarhynchos]) to 180 (Grey Heron [Ardea cinerea]). A significant positive correlation is demonstrated between the number of recorded folk-names for a species and a measure of ubiquity in the nineteenth century. Using original bird census data collected by the author for other purposes in the 1990s in farmland and woodland in Oxfordshire, United Kingdom, I demonstrate an overall correlation across Linnaean species between the number of names, number of monolexic names, and three measures of specific relative abundance and distribution. The percentage of names for a species that are monolexic, which is an indicator of familiarity, also correlated with the relative abundance of species in farmland, but this relationship was driven entirely by species with little recorded folklore. For those taxa with documented significance to nineteenth century and earlier English folk culture, which tend to carry more names than predicted by ecological ubiquity alone, there was no relationship between the extent of monolexis and the relative abundance of a species. The study suggests that ecological salience was a significant driver in bird naming in pre-industrial English folk culture, that more frequently encountered species were more likely to develop an associated folklore, but that an effect of acquired cultural salience operated as a driver of overall specific salience, potentially masking the effects of ecological salien
机译:在名称和知识之间相互作用的核心,是不同分类的相对显着性。亨恩(1999)描述了四种,半重叠的突出性:表型,感知,文化和生态。虽然前三者被记录得很好,但生态蓬勃仍然在很大程度上在文献中受到假设。在本文中,我通过参考3186次录制了英国鸟类的英国民间名称来测试亨恩的生态显着概念。在这项研究中表示的57种类型的名称数量从两种(Nightingale [Luscinia Megarhynchos])到180(灰色苍鹭[ardea cinerea])。在物种的记录的民间名称数量和十九世纪繁琐之间证明了显着的正相关性。使用作者在英国牛津郡农田和林地的1990年代收集的原始鸟类人口普查数据,我展示了Linnaean物种之间的整体相关性,单声道名称的数量和三个特定亲属措施丰富和分布。作为单声道的物种的名称的百分比,这是熟悉的指标,也与农田中的物种相对丰富相关,但这种关系是完全由具有很少记录的民间传说的物种驱动。对于那些对十九世纪和早期的英国民间文化有了记录的分类群,这往往只能携带更多的名字,而不是仅仅通过生态泛滥预期的名称,单根尾部和物种的相对丰富之间没有关系。该研究表明,生态显着性是工业前英语民间文化的鸟类命名的重要司机,更常见的物种更有可能发展有关的民间传说,但由于整体具体的驾驶员,所获得的文化蓬勃发展的效果显着性,可能掩盖生态施肥的影响

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号