...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery >The critical shoulder angle is associated with osteoarthritis in the shoulder but not rotator cuff tears: a retrospective case-control study
【24h】

The critical shoulder angle is associated with osteoarthritis in the shoulder but not rotator cuff tears: a retrospective case-control study

机译:临界肩部角度与肩部骨关节炎有关,但不是转子袖口撕裂:回顾性案例控制研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background In 2013 Moor et?al introduced the concept of the critical shoulder angle (CSA) and suggested that an abnormal CSA was a leading factor in development of rotator cuff tear (RCT) and osteoarthritis (OA) of the shoulder. This study assessed whether the CSA was associated with RCT and OA and tested the inter- and intrarater reliability of the CSA when measuring RCT and OA. Materials and methods The study was performed as a retrospective case-control study. The cases comprised 2 groups: 97 patients with RCT and 87 patients with OA. The controls were matched 3:1, by age and sex, from a population of 795 patients with humeral fractures. The CSA was measured as described by Moor et?al. Analysis of the relation with CSA for RCT and OA was done by logistic regression. Models were fitted separately for RCT and OA and used the controls matched to the respective cases. Inter- and intrarater reliability was determined by measuring the intraclass correlation coefficient and minimal detectable change. Results The mean CSA was 33.9° in the RCT group and 33.6° in the matched control group. The odds ratio for developing RCT for people with a CSA above 35° was 1.12 ( P ?=?.63). The mean CSA in the OA group was 31.1° and in the matched control group 33.3°. The odds ratio for developing OA for people with a CSA below 30° was 2.25 ( P ?=?.002). The CSA measurements showed strong intra- and inter-rater reliability, with intraclass correlation coefficient values above 0.92 and minimal detectable change values below 0.4°. Conclusions This study did not find any association between CSA and RCT but did show association between CSA and OA, with a 2.25 odds ratio of developing OA given the patient had a CSA below 30°. The results do not support the suggested praxis of shaving away the lateral border of the acromion to make the CSA smaller because it might increase the risk of developing OA without decreasing the risk of developing RCT. The CSA measurements showed excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability.
机译:背景技术在2013年Moor et?al介绍了临界肩部角度(CSA)的概念,并提出了异常CSA是肩部袖口撕裂(RCT)和肩部骨关节炎(OA)开发的主要因素。本研究评估了CSA是否与RCT和OA相关,并在测量RCT和OA时测试CSA的间歇性可靠性。材料和方法该研究是作为回顾性案例对照研究进行的。该病例包含2组:97例RCT和87例OA患者。通过795名肱骨骨折的患者,对照对照与年龄和性别相匹配。如Moor et?Al所述测量CSA。对RCT和OA对CSA的关系的分析是通过Logistic回归完成的。模型分别用于RCT和OA,并使用与各个案例相匹配的控制。通过测量内部相关系数和最小可检测变化来确定间和内在的可靠性。结果平均CSA在RCT组中为33.9°,在匹配对照组中为33.6°。为CSA高于35°的CSA开发RCT的差距为1.12(p?=Δ.63)。 OA组的平均CSA为31.1°,并在匹配对照组33.3°。 CSA低于30°的人的oA对OA开发OA的差距为2.25(p?= 002)。 CSA测量显示出强大的内部和帧间间可靠性,具有高于0.92的脑内相关系数值,并且最小可检测变化值低于0.4°。结论本研究没有发现CSA和RCT之间的任何关联,但表现出CSA和OA之间的关联,赋予患者在30°以下CSA的2.25个缺乏比率。结果不支持剃须肩部横向边界的建议实践,使CSA变小,因为它可能会增加开发OA的风险而不降低开发RCT的风险。 CSA测量显示出优异的帧内间可靠性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号