首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >The Critical Shoulder Angle Shows a Reciprocal Change in Magnitude When Evaluating Symptomatic Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears Versus Primary Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis as Compared With Control Subjects: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
【24h】

The Critical Shoulder Angle Shows a Reciprocal Change in Magnitude When Evaluating Symptomatic Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears Versus Primary Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis as Compared With Control Subjects: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

机译:当与对照组相比,当评估症状全厚度旋转器袖带腹部与初级胶质肿瘤性腹腔炎相比,临界肩部角度显示互惠变化幅度较大

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose: To determine whether a high critical shoulder angle (CSA) is associated with symptomatic full-thickness rotator cuff (RC) tears and/or whether a low C SA is associated with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA). Methods: A systematic review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. All observational studies that examined an association between CSA and full-thickness RC tears and/or primary GHOA were included. A primary meta-analysis was performed including all studies that met the inclusion criteria regardless of radiographic quality. A secondary meta-analysis was performed to explore the hypothesis that radiographic quality was a source of heterogeneity, which excluded those studies in which radiograph quality was not strictly defined and controlled. Results: For the primary meta-analysis, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria for RC tears and 5 for primary GHOA. The C SA was greater in the RC tear group than the control group (mean difference 4.03 degrees, 95% confidence interval 2.95 degrees-5.11, 95% prediction interval 0.0487 degrees-8.01 degrees; P < .001). The C SA was lower in the GHOA group than the control group (mean difference -3.98 degrees, 95% confidence interval -5.66 degrees to -2.31 degrees, 95% prediction interval -10.2 degrees to -2.19 degrees; P < .001).A high level of heterogeneity was observed in the RC tear analysis (I-2 = 88.4), which decreased after the exclusion of 5 studies based on radiographic quality (I-2 = 75.3). A high level of heterogeneity also was observed in the primary GHOA analysis (I-2 = 87.3), which decreased after the exclusion of 2 studies based on the radiographic quality (I-2 = 48.2). Conclusions: There is a reciprocal change in magnitude of the C SA when evaluating symptomatic full-thickness RC tears versus primary GHOA as compared with control subjects. Radiographic quality is a source of heterogeneity in studies that investigate a link between C SA and RC tears and primary GHOA.
机译:目的:确定高临界肩角(CSA)是否与症状全厚旋转器袖带(RC)撕裂和/或低C SA是否与初级胶质骨质骨关节炎(GHOA)相关联。方法:在系统评价和Meta分析指南的首选报告项目后进行系统审查。包括检查CSA和全厚度RC撕裂和/或初级GHOA之间的所有观察性研究。进行初级荟萃分析,包括所有符合纳入标准的所有研究,无论射线照相质量如何。进行次要的荟萃分析以探讨射线照相质量是异质性源的假设,其中排除了这些研究,其中没有严格定义和控制射线照度质量。结果:对于初级荟萃分析,11项研究符合RC泪液的纳入标准,5针对主Ghoa。在RC撕裂组中,C SA比对照组更大(平均差异4.03度,95%置信区间2.95摄氏度 - 5.11,95%预测间隔0.0487度-8.01度; p <.001)。在GHOA组中,CA较低,比对照组(平均差异-3.98度,95%置信区间-5.66度至-2.31度,95%预测间隔-10.2度至-2.19度; p <.001)。在RC撕裂分析(I-2 = 88.4)中观察到高水平的异质性,这在排除基于射线照相质量(I-2 = 75.3)之后减少了5次研究。在初级GhoA分析(I-2 = 87.3)中也观察到高水平的异质性,这在排除基于射线照相质量(I-2 = 48.2)之后减少了2种研究。结论:与对照对象相比,当评估症状全厚度RC撕裂时,C SA的响比变化较大。射线照相质量是研究C SA和RC撕裂和初级GHOA之间的联系的研究中的异质性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号