首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Service Theory and Practice >The differential effects of separated vs. unseparated services The roles of performance risk and regulatory focus
【24h】

The differential effects of separated vs. unseparated services The roles of performance risk and regulatory focus

机译:分离的与单独的服务的差异效应绩效风险和监管重点的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the effects of service separation on perceived value and intention to enroll in the higher education context, as mediated by perceived performance risk and moderated by an individual's regulatory focus. Design/methodology/approach Four experimental studies were conducted, a pilot study and three main studies. Participants evaluated higher education courses offered in either the unseparated (on-campus) or separated (online) mode. Findings Results show that: service separation influences perceived value; this effect is mediated by performance risk; and moderated by regulatory focus. Specifically, participants perceive higher education courses offered in the separated mode to have greater performance risk, which lowers their perceived value. This effect is enhanced for prevention-focused participants and mitigated for promotion-focused participants. Finally, service separation is found to influence intention to enroll in a course via performance risk and perceived value.
机译:目的本文的目的是审查服务分离对感知价值的影响和注册高等教育背景的意图,因为个人的监管重点通过感知绩效风险和主持的介绍。设计/方法/方法进行四项实验研究,进行试验研究和三项主要研究。与会者评估了在未分子(校园)或分离(在线)模式中提供的高等教育课程。研究结果表明:服务分离影响感知值;这种效果是通过性能风险介导的;并受到监管焦点的主持。具体而言,参与者在分离模式中感知高等教育课程具有更大的性能风险,这降低了他们的感知价值。对于预防关注的参与者来说,这种效果得到了增强,并减轻了以促进为中心的参与者。最后,发现服务分离会影响通过性能风险和感知价值进入课程的意图。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号