首页> 外文期刊>Journal of sex and marital therapy >Is 'Dilator Use' More Effective Than 'Finger Use' in Exposure Therapy in Vaginismus Treatment?
【24h】

Is 'Dilator Use' More Effective Than 'Finger Use' in Exposure Therapy in Vaginismus Treatment?

机译:是“扩张器使用”比换热治疗的暴露治疗中的“手指使用”更有效?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Vaginismus is the persistence of difficulties in allowing the vaginal entry of a penis, a finger or a gynecologic examination. This study aimed to compare the success rates of vaginismus therapy with exposure therapy treatment using a finger or a dilator. The finger training group (FTG) (n = 30) and the dilator training group (DTG) (n = 30) were established. Groups were trained about dilatation and desensitization. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) was applied. From the baseline measurement to the post-treatment measurement, the average change in FSFI scores for both groups was statistically significant (p < 0.001). There was a significant difference between two groups in terms of patient drop-out numbers (p = 0.016); the DTG was more successful in continuing treatment than the FTG. This research revealed that DTG is more successful in treatment continuity and show more improvement in sexual functions.
机译:阴道ismus是允许阴茎,手指或妇科检查的阴道进入困难的持续存在。 本研究旨在使用手指或扩张器比较曝光治疗治疗的阴道病治疗的成功率。 建立了手指训练组(FTG)(N = 30)和扩张训练组(DTG)(N = 30)。 群体培训了关于扩张和脱敏。 应用女性性功能指数(FSFI)。 从基线测量到后治疗后测量,两组FSFI评分的平均变化统计学意义(P <0.001)。 两组在患者辍学数方面存在显着差异(P = 0.016); DTG在持续治疗方面比FTG更成功。 该研究表明,DTG在治疗连续性方面更成功,表现出更加改善性功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号