...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of renal care >Antidepressant Usage in Haemodialysis Patients: Evidence of Sub‐Optimal Practice Patterns
【24h】

Antidepressant Usage in Haemodialysis Patients: Evidence of Sub‐Optimal Practice Patterns

机译:血液透析患者的抗抑郁用法:次优练习模式的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

SUMMARY Background Depression is common in patients on haemodialysis and associated with adverse outcomes. Antidepressant use is widespread though evidence of efficacy is limited. Objectives To study antidepressant management practices in patients on haemodialysis with reference to NICE guidelines on management of depression in adults with chronic physical health problems. Design Prospective, multicentre, longitudinal cohort study with 6–15 month follow‐up. Participants Patients on haemodialysis established on antidepressant medication. Measurements Baseline assessment of mood was undertaken using Beck Depression Inventory (BDI‐II). Demographic, clinical and medication data were also collected. Changes in clinical and life circumstances and medication during follow‐up were recorded. At follow‐up, BDI‐II was reassessed and diagnostic psychiatric assessment undertaken. Results Forty‐one patients were studied. General practitioners were the main prescribers (68%). Ten agents were in use, the commonest being Citalopram (39%). Doses were often suboptimal. At baseline, 30 patients had high BDI‐II scores (≥16) and 22 remained high at follow‐up. Eleven had BDI‐II??16 at baseline. In five, this increased on follow‐up to ≥16. Sixteen patients (39%) had no medication review during follow‐up, 14 (34%) had a dose review, and 11 (27%) a medication change. On psychiatric assessment at follow‐up, eight patients had current major depressive disorder (MDD), seven recurrent and 20 evidence of past MDD. Six displayed no evidence of ever having MDD. Conclusions Antidepressant management in patients on haemodialysis reflected poor drug selection, overprescription, under‐dosing and inadequate follow‐up suggesting sub‐optimal adherence to NICE guidelines. Most patients had high depression scores at follow‐up. Antidepressant use in haemodialysis requires reappraisal.
机译:发明内容背景抑郁在血液透析患者中​​是常见的,与不良结果相关。抗抑郁用途虽然有效的证据是有限的。关于血液透析患者抗抑郁管理实践的目的,参考慢性身体健康问题的成人抑郁症的良好指导方针。设计前瞻性,多期,纵向队列,6-15个月随访。参与者在抗抑郁药物中建立血液透析患者。测量使用Beck抑郁库存(BDI-II)进行了对情绪的基准评估。还收集了人口统计学,临床和药物数据。记录了在随访期间临床和生命情况和药物的变化。在随访中,BDI-II被重新评估和进行的诊断精神病评估。结果研究了40-一名患者。一般从业者是主要处方(68%)。使用十种药剂,最常见的是西酞普兰(39%)。剂量通常是次优。在基线时,30名患者的BDI-II分数高(≥16),22例在随访时保持高。十一有BDI-II?&?16在基线。五,随下来增加了≥16。六个患者(39%)在随访中没有药物审查,14例(34%)具有剂量审查,11例(27%)药物发生变化。关于随访的精神病评估,八名患者目前的主要抑郁症(MDD),七个经常性和20个过去MDD的证据。六显示没有任何证据表明MDD。结论血液透析患者抗抑郁药物反映了贫困药物选择,过度归立,欠款,不充分的随访,表明诸如良好指南的子最优依从性。大多数患者在随访时患有高萧条分数。血液透析中的抗抑郁药用途需要重新评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号