...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of psychoeducational assessment >Factorial Validity of the Anxiety Questionnaire for Students (AFS): Bifactor Modeling and Measurement Invariance
【24h】

Factorial Validity of the Anxiety Questionnaire for Students (AFS): Bifactor Modeling and Measurement Invariance

机译:学生焦虑问卷的因子有效性(AFS):双手模拟和测量不变性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The present study with 2,273 students aimed to examine the factorial validity of the Anxiety Questionnaire for Students (AFS) by using the bifactor modeling framework, that is, contrasting a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) model to an exploratory structural equation model (ESEM) and two bifactor models (B-CFA and B-ESEM). In addition, measurement invariance and latent mean differences in the three facets of the AFS (test anxiety, manifest anxiety, dislike of school) across gender, age groups, and school types were explored. Results provided strong support for the multidimensionality of the AFS. The B-ESEM showed the best fit to the data as opposed to the other models. Also, measurement invariance across gender, age groups, and school types was fully supported. Girls and younger students generally reported higher levels of anxiety than boys and older students, while the latter stated more dislike of school than girls and younger students. Furthermore, elementary school students showed generally higher levels of anxiety than students of the other school types.
机译:本研究与2,273名学生旨在通过使用双手模拟框架来检查学生(AFS)的焦虑问卷的因子有效性,即对比探索结构方程模型(ESEM)和勘探结构方程模型的确认因子分析(CFA)模型对比两个双手型号(B-CFA和B-ESEM)。此外,探讨了对性别,年龄组和学校类型的AFS三个面(测试焦虑,明显焦虑,学校)的三个小件(测试焦虑,表现焦虑,学校)的测量不变性和潜在差异。结果为AFS的多数量提供了强大的支持。 B-ESEM显示与其他模型相反的数据最合适。此外,完全支持了性别,年龄组和学校类型的测量不变性。女孩和较年轻的学生通常报告的焦虑程度高于男孩和老年学生,而后者则讨论比女孩和年轻的学生更不喜欢。此外,小学生的焦虑程度通常比其他学校类型更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号