...
首页> 外文期刊>Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. >Clinical trial: maintenance intermittent therapy with rabeprazole 20 mg in patients with symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease - a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study.
【24h】

Clinical trial: maintenance intermittent therapy with rabeprazole 20 mg in patients with symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease - a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study.

机译:临床试验:对有症状的胃食管反流病患者使用雷贝拉唑20 mg维持间歇治疗-这是一项双盲,安慰剂对照的随机研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Optimal long-term management of symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (sGERD) patients has not been established. AIM: To determine the clinical value of maintenance intermittent treatment with rabeprazole 20 mg vs. placebo in patients with sGERD. METHODS: This multicentre, US study enrolled patients with sGERD (>or=3-month history of GERD symptoms and >or=4 days/week of heartburn during a 2-week placebo run-in) without oesophageal erosions. Patients with complete heartburn control after 4 weeks of open-label rabeprazole 20 mg daily treatment were randomized to 6-month, double-blind, maintenance intermittent treatment (7- to 14-day courses when heartburn recurred) with rabeprazole 20 mg or placebo. RESULTS: The primary efficacy end point, mean percentage of heartburn-free days, was significantly greater with rabeprazole vs. placebo: 82.58% and 62.17% (ITT; P < 0.0001) [per protocol 86.74% rabeprazole vs. 74.93% placebo (P < 0.0254)]. Compared with placebo group, the rabeprazole group also experienced a significantly higher percentage of heartburn-free daytime (84.06% vs. 63.39%; P < 0.0001) and nighttime (95.41% vs. 90.25%; P = 0.0021) periods, had significantly fewer discontinuations because of insufficient heartburn control (6.3% vs. 36.3%; P < 0.0001) and took fewer antacid tablets daily (0.58 vs. 1.16; P = 0.0021). CONCLUSION: Intermittent use of rabeprazole may be an effective maintenance treatment strategy for patients with sGERD and warrants further investigation. This trial was registered with http://clinicaltrials.gov under the number NCT00165841.
机译:背景:有症状的胃食管反流病(sGERD)患者的最佳长期治疗方法尚未建立。目的:确定雷贝拉唑20 mg和安慰剂相比sGERD患者维持间歇治疗的临床价值。方法:这项多中心的美国研究招募了没有食管侵蚀的sGERD患者(≥2个月的GERD症状病史,在2周安慰剂磨合期间≥4天/周的胃灼热)。接受开放标签的雷贝拉唑20 mg每日治疗4周后具有完全烧心控制的患者被随机分配至接受20 mg雷贝拉唑或安慰剂的6个月,双盲,维持性间歇治疗(复发性烧心时为7至14天疗程)。结果:雷贝拉唑相对于安慰剂的主要疗效终点,无胃灼热天的平均百分比显着更高:分别为82.58%和62.17%(ITT; P <0.0001)[根据方案,雷贝拉唑86.74%与安慰剂74.93%(P <0.0254)]。与安慰剂组相比,雷贝拉唑组白天无心灼伤的比例(84.06%vs. 63.39%; P <0.0001)和夜间(95.41%vs. 90.25%; P = 0.0021)的比例明显更高,明显少于安慰剂组。因胃灼热控制不佳而停药(6.3%比36.3%; P <0.0001),每天服用较少的抗酸药片(0.58比1.16; P = 0.0021)。结论:间歇性使用雷贝拉唑可能是sGERD患者的有效维持治疗策略,值得进一步研究。该试验已在http://clinicaltrials.gov注册,编号为NCT00165841。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号