...
首页> 外文期刊>Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. >Clinical trial: the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care--prospective randomized comparison of rabeprazole 20 mg with esomeprazole 20 and 40 mg.
【24h】

Clinical trial: the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care--prospective randomized comparison of rabeprazole 20 mg with esomeprazole 20 and 40 mg.

机译:临床试验:初级保健中的胃食管反流疾病的治疗-雷贝拉唑20 mg与埃索美拉唑20和40 mg的前瞻性随机比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: A trial of empirical PPI therapy is usual practice for most patients with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in primary care. AIM: To determine if the 4-week efficacy of rabeprazole 20 mg for resolving heartburn and regurgitation symptoms is non-inferior to esomeprazole 40 mg or 20 mg. METHODS: In all, 1392 patients were randomized to rabeprazole 20 mg, esomeprazole 20 mg or 40 mg once daily. Patients, doctors and assessors were blinded. Symptom resolution data were collected on days 0-7 and day-28 using the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders Symptom Severity Index with a shortened version used on days 8-27. RESULTS: Rabeprazole 20 mg was non-inferior to esomeprazole 40 mg for complete resolution of regurgitation and satisfactory resolution of heartburn and regurgitation. For complete heartburn resolution, the efficacy of rabeprazole 20 mg and esomeprazole 40 mg was statistically indistinguishable, although the non-inferiority test was inconclusive. Rabeprazole 20 mg was non-inferior to esomeprazole 20 mg for all outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In uninvestigated GERD patients, rabeprazole 20 mg was non-inferior to esomeprazole 40 mg for complete and satisfactory relief of regurgitation and satisfactory relief of heartburn, and not different for complete resolution of heartburn.
机译:背景:对于大多数初级保健中有胃食管反流病(GERD)症状的患者,通常采用经验性PPI治疗试验。目的:确定雷贝拉唑20 mg在解决胃灼热和反流症状方面的4周疗效是否不逊于40 mg或20 mg esomeprazole。方法:总共1392例患者被随机分为雷贝拉唑20 mg,埃索美拉唑20 mg或40 mg每天一次。患者,医生和评估者不知情。使用上消化道疾病症状严重程度指数的患者评估在第0-7天和第28天收集症状缓解数据,并在8-27天使用缩短版。结果:雷贝拉唑20毫克不逊于埃索美拉唑40毫克,可以完全解决反流和令人满意的胃灼热和反流。对于完全的胃灼热消退,尽管非劣效性试验尚无定论,但雷贝拉唑20 mg和埃索美拉唑40 mg的疗效在统计学上无法区分。在所有结局方面,雷贝拉唑20 mg均不逊于埃索美拉唑20 mg。结论:在未经调查的GERD患者中,雷贝拉唑20毫克在完全和令人满意的缓解反流和胃灼热方面不逊于埃索美拉唑40毫克,并且在胃灼热的完全缓解方面没有区别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号