首页> 外文期刊>American journal of dentistry >Evaluation of fluorescence imaging with reflectance enhancement technology for early caries detection
【24h】

Evaluation of fluorescence imaging with reflectance enhancement technology for early caries detection

机译:利用反射增强技术评估荧光成像的早期龋齿

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: A technology based on fluorescence imaging with reflectance enhancement (FIRE) was validated for early detection of caries. Methods: In Phase-I, caries-like lesions were created in a defined window on 85 teeth by 14-day demineralization in acidified gel. During demineralization, teeth were examined for caries every 6 hours for 24 hours, and thereafter daily by visual examination (VE), FIRE, Quantitative light-induced Fluorescence (QLF), and DIAGNOdent pen (DDp). Five teeth were withdrawn after each examination. A tooth slice was cut from each window and examined under polarizing-light microscopy (PLM) for lesion presence/absence and lesion depth quantification. In Phase-II, 56 teeth assembled on mouth models were examined twice by two dentists for caries using the four methods. Each scored area was examined with PLM. Using Dentist-1/Examination-1 data, the Areas under Receiver Operating Characteristics curves (A-ROC-c) defined by each diagnostic method were compared using Chi-squared tests. Using same data, the validity of each diagnostic method in detecting caries relative to PLM was calculated by Kappa statistics. Results: Earliest lesion depth detected by FIRE, QLF, and YE was 9.09 +/- 0.03 mu m. DDp detected from 14.00 mu m. AROC-c were significantly (P< 0.001) greater with FIRE compared with QLF and DDp. Similar results were observed with subsequent examinations by both dentists. Sensitivity, specificity and validity of each method are: FIRE (0.98, 0.80, 0.79), QLF (0.66, 0.81, 0.46), DDp (0.35, 0.94, 0.23) and VE (0.78, 0.85, 0.63), respectively.
机译:目的:基于荧光成像的反射增强技术(FIRE)已被验证可用于龋齿的早期检测。方法:在I期中,在酸化凝胶中经过14天的脱矿质处理,在85个牙齿的特定窗口中形成了龋齿样病变。在脱盐过程中,每6个小时检查一次牙齿,持续24个小时,然后每天进行肉眼检查(VE),FIRE,定量光诱导荧光(QLF)和DIAGNOdent笔(DDp)。每次检查后拔出五颗牙齿。从每个窗口切出牙齿切片,并在偏振光显微镜(PLM)下检查病变的存在/不存在和病变深度的量化。在第二阶段中,两名牙医使用四种方法对在口腔模型上组装的56颗牙齿进行了两次龋齿检查。每个评分区域均通过PLM进行检查。使用Dentist-1 / Examination-1数据,使用卡方检验比较每种诊断方法定义的接收器工作特性曲线下的面积(A-ROC-c)。使用相同的数据,通过Kappa统计数据计算出每种诊断方法在检测相对于PLM的龋齿中的有效性。结果:FIRE,QLF和YE检测到的最早的病变深度为9.09 +/- 0.03μm。从14.00微米检测到DDp。与QLF和DDp相比,FIRE的AROC-c显着更高(P <0.001)。两位牙医随后的检查也观察到了相似的结果。每种方法的敏感性,特异性和有效性分别为:FIRE(0.98、0.80、0.79),QLF(0.66、0.81、0.46),DDp(0.35、0.94、0.23)和VE(0.78、0.85、0.63)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号