...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of proteome research >Filter-Based Protein Digestion (FPD): A Detergent-Free and Scaffold-Based Strategy for TMT Workflows
【24h】

Filter-Based Protein Digestion (FPD): A Detergent-Free and Scaffold-Based Strategy for TMT Workflows

机译:基于过滤的蛋白质消化(FPD):用于TMT工作流的无洗涤剂和基于脚手架的策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

High-throughput proteome profiling requires thorough optimization to achieve comprehensive analysis. We developed a filter aided sample preparation (FASP)-like, detergent-free method, termed Filter-Based Protein Digestion (FPD). We compared FPD to protein extraction methods commonly used in isobaric tag-based proteome profiling, namely trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and chloroform–methanol (C–M) precipitation. We divided a mammalian whole cell lysate from the SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line for parallel protein processing with TCA ( n = 3), C–M ( n = 2), and FPD using either 10 kDa ( n = 3) or 30 kDa ( n = 3) molecular weight cutoff membranes. We labeled each sample with tandem mass tag (TMT) reagents to construct a TMT11-plex experiment. In total, 8654 proteins were quantified across all samples. Pairwise comparisons showed very little deviation for individual protein abundance measurements between the two FPD methods, whereas TCA and FPD showed the most difference. Specifically, membrane proteins were more readily quantified when samples were processed using TCA precipitation than other methods tested. However, globally, only 4% of proteins differed greater than 4-fold in the most divergent pair of protein extraction methods (i.e., FPD10 and TCA). We conclude that the detergent-free FPD strategy, particularly using the faster-flowing 30 kDa filter, is a seamless alteration to high-throughput TMT workflows.
机译:高通量蛋白质组分析需要彻底优化以实现综合分析。我们开发了过滤器辅助样品制备(FASP) - 样式,无洗涤剂的方法,称为基于过滤的蛋白质消化(FPD)。我们将FPD与蛋白质提取方法进行比较,通常用于基于同级标签的蛋白质组分析,即三氯乙酸(TCA)和氯仿 - 甲醇(C-M)沉淀。我们将哺乳动物全细胞裂解物从SH-Sy5Y神经母细胞瘤细胞系中分开,用于使用TCA(n = 3),C-M(n = 2)和FPD使用10kDa(n = 3)或30kDa的FPD (n = 3)分子量截止膜。我们用串联质量标签(TMT)试剂标记了每个样品,以构建TMT11-PLEX实验。总共,在所有样品中定量了8654种蛋白质。成对比较显示两个FPD方法之间的单个蛋白质丰度测量的偏差很小,而TCA和FPD显示出最差异。具体地,当使用TCA沉淀处理样品时,更容易地定量膜蛋白,而不是测试的其他方法。然而,在全球范围内,在最分歧的蛋白质提取方法(即,FPD10和TCA)中,仅4%的蛋白质在最分歧的蛋白质提取方法中差异大于4倍。我们得出结论,无污染的FPD策略,特别是使用更快的30克达过滤器,是对高吞吐量TMT工作流程的无缝改变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号