首页> 外文期刊>American journal of critical care >Oral care interventions and oropharyngeal colonization in children receiving mechanical ventilation.
【24h】

Oral care interventions and oropharyngeal colonization in children receiving mechanical ventilation.

机译:机械通气患儿的口腔护理干预和口咽部定植。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Recent progress in identification of oral microorganisms has shown that the oropharynx can be a site of origin for dissemination of pathogenic organisms to distant body sites, such as the lungs. OBJECTIVE: To compare the oropharyngeal microbiological profile, duration of mechanical ventilation, and length of stay in the intensive care unit of children receiving mechanical ventilation who had pharmacological or nonpharmacological oral care. METHODS: A randomized and controlled study was performed in a pediatric intensive unit in Sao Paulo, Brazil. A total of 56 children were randomly assigned to an experimental group (n=27, 48%) that received oral care with use of 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate or a control group (n=29, 52%) that received oral care without an antiseptic. Oropharyngeal secretions were collected and cultured on days 0, 2, and 4, and at discharge. RESULTS: The 2 groups had similar demographic characteristics, preexisting underlying diseases, and pharmacological, nutritional, and ventilatory support. Gram-negative bacteria were the predominant pathogens: Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enter-obacter species. The 2 groups did not differ significantly in the colonization of normal (P= .72) or pathogenic (P= .62) flora, in the duration of mechanical ventilation (P= .67), or in length of stay in the intensive care (P= .22). CONCLUSION: Use of chlorhexidine combined with nonpharmacological oral care did not decrease the colonization profile, duration of mechanical ventilation, or length of stay in critically ill children receiving mechanical ventilation.
机译:背景:口腔微生物鉴定的最新进展表明,口咽可能是将病原性生物传播到诸如肺等遥远身体部位的起源部位。目的:比较接受药理学或非药理学口腔护理的接受机械通气的儿童的口咽微生物学特征,机械通气时间和重症监护病房的住院时间。方法:在巴西圣保罗的一个儿科重症监护室进行了一项随机对照研究。共有56名儿童被随机分配到使用0.12%葡萄糖酸洗必泰的实验组(n = 27,48%)或对照组(n = 29,52%)接受无防腐剂的口腔护理的实验组中。在第0、2和4天以及出院时收集并培养口咽分泌物。结果:两组具有相似的人口统计学特征,既存的基础疾病以及药理,营养和通气支持。革兰氏阴性菌是主要病原体:鲍曼不动杆菌,铜绿假单胞菌,肺炎克雷伯菌和肠杆菌。两组在正常菌群(P = .72)或病原菌(P = .62)的定植,机械通气时间(P = .67)或重症监护病房的住院时间方面无显着差异(P = .22)。结论:洗必泰与非药物口腔护理相结合并没有降低定植在危重病患儿中的机械通气时间,机械通气时间或持续时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号