首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods >Comparison of sublingual, facial and retro-bulbar blood sampling in mice in relation to animal welfare and blood quality
【24h】

Comparison of sublingual, facial and retro-bulbar blood sampling in mice in relation to animal welfare and blood quality

机译:与动物福利和血液质量相关的小鼠舌下,面部和复古泡菜血液取样的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: Repeated blood sampling is a common procedure in laboratory mice, but at present it is unknown which technique has the least impact on the animals when large or repeated blood samples are required. Retrobulbar sinus puncture is a reliable technique but has been shown to cause many changes in the animals, why sublingual and facial vein puncture have been suggested as suitable alternatives. This study investigated 1) which of the three blood sampling techniques had the least impact on nest building activity, level of faecal corticosterone metabolites, body weight, fur status, and macroscopic changes, 2) whether the blood sampling techniques gave rise to variation in blood quality between blood samples, and 3) whether sublingual and facial vein puncture should be performed with or without anaesthesia in female C57BL/6 mice.
机译:简介:重复血液采样是实验室小鼠中的常见程序,但目前还是未知需要在需要大或反复血液样品时对动物产生最小的影响。 Retrobulbar Sinus穿刺是一种可靠的技术,但已被证明导致动物的许多变化,为什么舌下和面部静脉穿刺被建议作为合适的替代品。 本研究研究了1)三种血液采样技术对巢建筑活动的影响最小,粪便皮质酮代谢物,体重,毛皮状况和宏观变化,2)血液采样技术是否产生了血液的变异 血液样本之间的质量和3)舌下和面部静脉穿刺是否应在雌性C57BL / 6小鼠中进行或没有麻醉进行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号