首页> 外文期刊>Journal of pest science >Impact of intercept trap type on plume structure: a potential mechanism for differential performance of intercept trap designs for Monochamus species
【24h】

Impact of intercept trap type on plume structure: a potential mechanism for differential performance of intercept trap designs for Monochamus species

机译:拦截陷阱类型对羽流结构的影响:截止陷阱设计差异性能的潜在机制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Studies have demonstrated that semiochemical-baited intercept traps differ in their performance for sampling insects, but we have an incomplete understanding of how and why intercept trap design effects vary among insects. This can significantly delay both the development of new and optimization of existing survey and detection tools. The development of a mechanistic understanding of why trap performance varies within and among species would mitigate this delay. The primary objective of this study was to develop methods to characterize and compare the odor plumes associated with intercept traps that differ in their performance for forest Coleoptera. We released CO2 and measured fluctuations of this tracer gas from 175-point locations arranged in a 2-by-3-by-2-m grid cuboid downwind of a standard multiple-funnel, a modified multiple-funnel, a panel, a canopy malaise trap, and a blank control (i.e., no trap) in a greenhouse. Significant differences in trapping efficacy between these different trap designs were observed for Monochamus scutellatus (Say) and Monochamus notatus (Drury) in a field trial. Significant differences were also observed in how CO2 accumulated in time at different positions downwind among these different trap designs. Turbulent dispersion is the dominant force structuring odor plumes and creates intermittency in the odor plume that is important for sustained upwind flight in insects. Methodological and instrumental limitations resulted in the inability to determine instantaneous plume structures and vortex shedding frequencies for different intercept trap designs. Although we observed differences in the odor plumes emanating downwind of the different intercept trap designs, we were unable to reconcile these differences with capture rates of the different trap designs for M. scutellatus and M. notatus.
机译:研究表明,半化禁鸟拦截陷阱对它们的采样昆虫的性能不同,但我们对昆虫之间的拦截陷阱设计效果变化的方法以及为何进行了不完整的理解。这可以显着延迟现有调查和检测工具的新和优化的开发。对机械理解的发展为什么陷阱性能在物种内和物种中的变化会减轻这种延迟。本研究的主要目的是开发方法,以表征和比较与截止陷阱相关的气味羽毛,其对森林鞘翅目性能不同。我们释放了二氧化碳,并从标准多漏斗的2×3×2M网格长方体的175点位置测量了该示踪气体的波动,该样标多漏斗,改进的多漏斗,面板,遮篷在温室中,Malaise陷阱,以及空白控制(即,没有陷阱)。对于Monochamus Scutellatus(例如)和Monochamus Notatus(Drury),观察到这些不同陷阱设计之间的捕获疗效的显着差异。在这些不同的陷阱设计中的不同位置在不同位置累积时也观察到显着差异。湍流色散是结构化气味羽毛的主要力量,并在昆虫中持续逆风飞行是重要的。方法论和仪器的限制导致无法确定不同拦截陷阱设计的瞬时羽流结构和涡流脱落频率。虽然我们观察到异味羽毛的差异,但是我们无法调和不同陷阱设计的捕获率和M.Scutellatus和M. Notatus的捕获率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号