...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of personality and social psychology >Does the Future Look Bright? Processing Style Determines the Impact of Valence Weighting Biases and Self-Beliefs on Expectations
【24h】

Does the Future Look Bright? Processing Style Determines the Impact of Valence Weighting Biases and Self-Beliefs on Expectations

机译:未来看起来很明亮吗? 处理风格决定了价值加权偏见和自信对期望的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

People regularly form expectations about their future, and whether those expectations are positive or negative can have important consequences. So, what determines the valence of people's expectations? Research seeking to answer this question by using an individual-differences approach has established that trait biases in optimistic/pessimistic self-beliefs and, more recently, trait biases in behavioral tendencies to weight one's past positive versus negative experiences more heavily each predict the valence of people's typical expectations. However, these two biases do not correlate, suggesting limits on a purely individual-differences approach to predicting people's expectations. We hypothesize that, because these two biases appear to operate via distinct processes (with self-beliefs operating top-down and valence weighting bias operating bottom-up), to predict a person's expectations on a given occasion, it is also critical to consider situational factors influencing processing style. To test this hypothesis, we investigated how an integral part of future thinking that influences processing style-mental imagery-determines each bias's influence. Two experiments measured valence weighting biases and optimistic/pessimistic self-beliefs, then manipulated whether participants formed expectations using their own first-person visual perspective (which facilitates bottom-up processes) or an external third-person visual perspective (which facilitates top-down processes). Expectations corresponded more with valence weighting biases from the first-person (vs. third-person) but more with self-beliefs from the third-person (vs. first-person). Two additional experiments manipulated valence weighting bias, demonstrating its causal role in shaping expectations (and behaviors) with first-person, but not third-person, imagery. These results suggest the two biases operate via distinct processes, holding implications for interventions to increase optimism.
机译:人们经常形成对他们未来的期望,以及这些期望是否是积极的或负面影响可能会产生重要的后果。那么,什么决定了人们期望的价值?研究寻求通过使用个人差异方法来回回答这个问题已经确定了特征在乐观/悲观的自信中的特质偏见,最近,行为倾向的特质偏见为重量为一个人的过去的积极体验,每个人都预测了人们的典型期望。然而,这两个偏差不相关,暗示了对预测人们期望的纯粹个别差异方法的限制。我们假设这一点,因为这两个偏差似乎通过不同的过程(具有自我信仰的自我信仰,以自上而下和价值偏向的偏见,偏压偏压),以预测一个人对给定场合的期望,考虑情境也是至关重要的影响加工风格的因素。为了测试这一假设,我们调查了将来的未来思维的一个组成部分,影响处理风格的心理图像 - 确定每个偏差的影响。两个实验测量价值偏差和乐观/悲观的自信,然后操纵参与者是否使用自己的第一人类视角(促进自下而上流程)或外部第三人称视角(以自上而下的促进流程)。期望与第一人称(与第三人称)的价值相对相当,但更多来自第三人(与第一人称)的自我信仰。两种额外的实验操纵价值偏差,展示了与第一人称的期望(和行为)的因果作用,但不是第三人的意象。这些结果表明,两种偏差通过不同的过程运行,持有对干预措施的影响增加乐观。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号