首页> 外文期刊>Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica >Severe community-acquired pneumonia treated with β-lactam-respiratory quinolone vs. β-lactam-macrolide combination
【24h】

Severe community-acquired pneumonia treated with β-lactam-respiratory quinolone vs. β-lactam-macrolide combination

机译:β-内酰胺-呼吸性喹诺酮与β-内酰胺-大环内酯联用治疗严重社区获得性肺炎

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: This study aimed to compare the outcome of patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP) treated with the combination of either b-lactam-quinolone (bQ) or b-lactam-macrolide (bM) antibiotics. Methods: We retrospectively studied a cohort of patients with SCAP treated from January 2000 to December 2010 at a mixed university-level intensive care unit (ICU). APACHE II score, SCAP severity assessed by IDSA/ATS score, first antibiotic treatment initiated during the initial 24 h of admission, ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), and ICU, hospital, 30 and 60-day mortalities were assessed. Results: Altogether, 210 patients with SCAP were analyzed, 104 in the bQ arm and 106 in the bM arm. Median APACHE II scores on admission were higher in the bM group (22 vs. 18, P = 0.003). More patients in the bQ group required mechanical ventilation (63.1% vs. 42.5%, P = 0.004) and fulfilled IDSA/ATS SCAP criteria (n = 87; 83.7%) than those in the bM group (n = 73; 68.9%; P = 0.015). Thirty-day mortality was 16.3% in the bQ group and 24.5% in the bM group (P = 0.17), and with septic shock mortality was 19.6% and 32.6%, respectively (P = 0.16). On APACHE II and IDSA/ATS SCAP score adjusted multivariate logistic regression analysis, the bM group had a slightly higher but not significant odds ratio (OR) for a 30-day mortality compared to the bQ group (OR 1.4; 95% CI, 0.62-3.0; P = 0.44). Conclusion: Thirty-day mortality rate of SCAP patients did not differ whether they were treated with either bQ or bM combination.
机译:背景:本研究旨在比较使用β-内酰胺-喹诺酮(bQ)或b-内酰胺-大环内酯(bM)抗生素治疗的严重社区获得性肺炎(SCAP)患者的结局。方法:我们回顾性研究了2000年1月至2010年12月在大学混合重症监护病房(ICU)接受治疗的SCAP患者队列。 APACHE II评分,通过IDSA / ATS评分评估的SCAP严重程度,入院初期24小时内开始的首次抗生素治疗,ICU和住院时间(LOS)以及ICU住院,30天和60天死亡率进行了评估。结果:总共分析了210例SCAP患者,其中bQ组104例,bM组106例。 bM组入院时APACHE II的中位数得分较高(22比18,P = 0.003)。与bM组相比,bQ组需要机械通气的患者更多(63.1%比42.5%,P = 0.004),并且符合IDSA / ATS SCAP标准(n = 87; 83.7%)。 P = 0.015)。 bQ组的30天死亡率为16.3%,bM组为24.5%(P = 0.17),败血性休克死亡率分别为19.6%和32.6%(P = 0.16)。在APACHE II和IDSA / ATS SCAP评分调整的多元Logistic回归分析中,bM组在30天死亡率中的比值比(OR)略高,但不显着(OR 1.4; 95%CI,0.62 -3.0; P = 0.44)。结论:无论是bQ还是bM联合治疗,SCAP患者的30天死亡率均无差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号