首页> 外文期刊>American journal of bioethics >Human dignity and transhumanism: Do anthro-technological devices have moral status?
【24h】

Human dignity and transhumanism: Do anthro-technological devices have moral status?

机译:人的尊严和超人类主义:人类技术手段是否具有道德地位?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, I focus on the concept of human dignity and critically assess whether such a concept, as used in the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, is indeed a useful tool for bioethical debates. However, I consider this concept within the context of the development of emerging technologies, that is, with a particular focus on transhumanism. The question I address is not whether attaching artificial limbs or enhancing particular traits or capacities would dehumanize or undignify persons but whether nonbiological entities introduced into or attached to the human body contribute to the "augmentation" of human dignity. First, I outline briefly how the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights uses the concept of dignity. Second, I look at the possibility of a universal bioethics in relation to the concept of human dignity. Third, I examine the concept of posthuman dignity and whether the concept of human dignity as construed in the declaration has any relevance to posthuman dignity.
机译:在本文中,我将重点放在人类尊严的概念上,并严格评估《生物伦理与人权世界宣言》中使用的这一概念是否确实是进行生物伦理辩论的有用工具。但是,我认为这一概念是在新兴技术发展的背景下进行的,即特别关注超人类主义。我要解决的问题不是附着人造肢体或增强特定的性状或能力是否会使人丧失人性或丧失尊严,而是引入或附着于人体的非生物实体是否有助于增强人的尊严。首先,我简要概述《世界生物伦理与人权宣言》如何使用尊严的概念。第二,我看一看关于人类尊严概念的普遍生物伦理学的可能性。第三,我研究了后人类尊严的概念,以及宣言中解释的人的尊严概念是否与后人尊严有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号