首页> 外文期刊>American journal of bioethics >Randomization Should Be Disclosed to Potential Research Subjects
【24h】

Randomization Should Be Disclosed to Potential Research Subjects

机译:应该向潜在的研究对象公开随机化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

One of the questions raised by the SUPPORT study is,what information should be disclosed to potential research subjects? Wendler (2013) argues that potential research subjects should be told that they are being asked to contribute to a research study designed to collect information to help others (and not uniquely-or primarily-the research subject). Researchers should also disclose information about the net risks of the study, that is, risks that are not compensated by an increased potential for clinical benefit. Otherwise, information disclosed about the procedures in a study should be similar to the information disclosed to patients in the clinical setting (Wendler 2013). Wendler claims that one of the implications of this argument is thatwhen clinical equipoise obtains, there is no need to disclose randomization to potential research subjects.We argue thatWendler's argument concerning randomization is not persuasive. The concept of clinical equipoise has no definitive bearing on disclosure standards in clinical research. A potential research subject's ability to make informed decisions about trial participation depends on researchers disclosing information about the procedures, risks, benefits, and methods of a trial, including randomization.
机译:SUPPORT研究提出的问题之一是,应向潜在的研究对象公开哪些信息? Wendler(2013)认为,应该告知潜在的研究对象,要求他们为旨在收集信息以帮助他人(而不是唯一或主要是研究对象)的信息的研究做出贡献。研究人员还应披露有关研究净风险的信息,即不能通过增加的临床获益潜力来补偿的风险。否则,有关研究程序的信息应与临床情况下向患者披露的信息相似(Wendler 2013)。 Wendler声称,这一论点的含义之一是,当获得临床平衡时,就无需向潜在的研究对象披露随机化。我们认为,Wendler关于随机化的论据没有说服力。临床平衡的概念与临床研究的披露标准没有明确的关系。潜在的研究对象就试验参与做出明智决定的能力取决于研究者披露有关试验的程序,风险,收益和试验方法的信息,包括随机化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号