首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Molluscan Studies >Morphometric methods for the analysis and classification of gastropods: a comparison using Littorina littorea
【24h】

Morphometric methods for the analysis and classification of gastropods: a comparison using Littorina littorea

机译:用于分析和分类的形态学方法:利用Littorina Littorea的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The study of morphology is a common means of biological grouping and classification. In recent years, morphometric studies have been dominated by quantitative geometric-morphometric methods of data extraction such as outline or landmark-based analysis. These methods are often used in conjunction with various classification methods such as linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and random forests (RF) in order to achieve inter-and intraspecific grouping based on environmental factors. Despite numerous studies incorporating these data-extraction and classification methods, comparisons of the effectiveness of these methods are largely lacking, especially for species which display low morphological variation. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two data-extraction methods, elliptic Fourier analysis (EFA) and generalized Procrustes analysis, and two classification methods, LDA and RF, using Littorina littorea as the study organism. The results show that the principal component scores derived from EFA, provided the optimal data input for classification while the greatest percentage of successfully classified individuals was achieved using LDA. However, based on this study RF is the recommended classification method as it is resistant to overfitting, makes no assumptions about the data, is well suited to morphometric data and produces similar rates of classification to LDA. The results are discussed in a biological context for L. littorea, based on the environmental factors of zonation and shore exposure.
机译:形态学的研究是生物学分组和分类的常见手段。近年来,形态测量研究已经由数据提取的定量几何形态学方法主导,例如大纲或基于地标的分析。这些方法通常与各种分类方法结合使用,例如线性判别分析(LDA)和随机森林(RF),以实现基于环境因素的间歇分组。尽管掺入了这些数据提取和分类方法的许多研究,但这些方法的有效性的比较主要缺乏​​,特别是对于显示低形态变异的物种。本研究的目的是比较两种数据提取方法,椭圆形傅立叶分析(EFA)和广义促进分析的有效性,以及使用Littorina Littorea作为研究生物的两种分类方法,LDA和RF。结果表明,来自EFA的主要成分分数,提供了用于分类的最佳数据输入,而使用LDA实现了最大的成功分类个人百分比。然而,基于该研究RF是推荐的分类方法,因为它耐过性,没有关于数据的假设,非常适合于形态学数据,并产生与LDA的类似分类速率。结果在L. Littorea的生物学背景下讨论了L. Littorea的基于区分区环境因素。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Molluscan Studies》 |2018年第2期|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Galway Mayo Inst Technol Dept Nat Sci Marine &

    Freshwater Res Ctr Dublin Rd Galway Ireland;

    Galway Mayo Inst Technol Dept Nat Sci Marine &

    Freshwater Res Ctr Dublin Rd Galway Ireland;

    Galway Mayo Inst Technol Dept Nat Sci Marine &

    Freshwater Res Ctr Dublin Rd Galway Ireland;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 动物学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号