...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of occupational and environmental medicine >Cost-Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and a Workplace Intervention for Employees on Sickness Absence due to Mental Disorders
【24h】

Cost-Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and a Workplace Intervention for Employees on Sickness Absence due to Mental Disorders

机译:接受和承诺治疗的成本效益以及员工因精神障碍而对疾病缺席的工作场所干预

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate cost-effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) and workplace dialogue intervention (WDI), both as stand-alone interventions and in combination, compared with treatment as usual (TAU), for employees on sickness absence with mental disorders. Methods: Employees (n = 352, 78.4% females) on sickness absence were randomized to one of four groups. Cost-utility analyses were conducted from a health care perspective and a limited societal perspective. Results: All groups reported significant improvements in health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) and there were no significant differences in HRQoL or costs between groups. The probability of costeffectiveness for ACTthornWDI was 50% compared with ACT, indicating that both treatment alternatives could be considered equally favorable for decision- makers. TAU and WDI were rejected due to less economic efficiency. Conclusion: Adding WDI to ACT cannot be recommended on the basis of our study results.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估接受和承诺治疗的成本效益(法案)和工作场所对话干预(WDI),无论是单独的干预措施还是组合,与常规(TAU)的治疗相比,员工关于疾病患有精神障碍。方法:对疾病缺失的员工(n = 352,78.4%)随机分为四组中的一组。从医疗保健角度和有限的社会角度进行了成本实用程序分析。结果:所有群体报告了与健康相关的生活质量(HRQOL)的重大改进,并且在群体之间没有显着差异或成本。与行为相比,宪术效益的概率为50%,表明两种治疗方法都可能被认为是对决策者的同样有利。由于经济效率较少,TAU和WDI被拒绝。结论:在我们的研究结果的基础上,不能建议使用WDI行动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号