首页> 外文期刊>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology: the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology >Determinants associated with making prenatal screening decisions in a national study
【24h】

Determinants associated with making prenatal screening decisions in a national study

机译:与在国家研究中进行产前筛查决策相关的决定因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This study sought to evaluate the associations between background exposures and psychological determinants, among postpartum Jewish and Arab women, relative to actual prenatal test endorsement. The independent and aggregative effects of contextual features and the subjective opinions and attitudes relative to a prenatal testing were evaluated, using logistic regressions. After accounting for contextual features, Jews with positive vs. negative opinions on screening were significantly more likely to undergo a prenatal screening. Specifically, having more favourable ideas on pregnancy termination, among Jews, was associated with a greater likelihood of triple test, nuchal translucency and ultrasound uptake as compared with those that refused. Similarly, Arabs who were more inclined to abort the pregnancy had a greater chance of using nuchal translucency and ultrasound vs. those that declined testing. As the preferences for prenatal test outcomes are multifaceted and vary according to population group, a better understanding of the factors involved in making testing choices could help ease the decision-making process. Impact Statement What is already known on this subject? The choice to undergo prenatal screening tests is influenced by various determinants, which include: social, demographic and emotional factors that vary by cultural preferences. Indeed, women integrate (subjective) beliefs and values that extend beyond rational (objective) reasoning when estimating whether or not to undergo testing. It may then be that, prenatal test choices might be, influenced less by actual risk status and more so by emotional factors. And while, the latter are more likely to be amendable, and thus influence changes in perception, the effect of psychological exposures on the decision making process in the genetic testing context, especially among Israeli Jews and Arabs, has been understudied. What the results of this study add? The current study extends the focus by addressing the role of evaluative beliefs and emotional factors involved with formulating prenatal screening judgments relative to actual testing among individuals with diverse profiles (Israeli Jews and Arabs). What was clarified was that background factors and psychological perceptions, such as having supportive attitudes on screening and a willingness to undergo abortion were, for the most part, related to prenatal test uptake. Concomitantly, these involve dense decision-making practices that can be difficult to approximate, as cultural settings and individual preferences often have an impact on intention-to-test.
机译:该研究旨在评估背景暴露和心理决定因素之间的协会,相对于实际产前测试认可。使用Logistic回归评估了语境特征的独立和聚合效应和相对于产前测试的主观意见和态度。在核算上下文特征之后,具有阳性与筛选的负面意见的犹太人显着更容易接受产前筛查。具体而言,与犹太人之间的怀孕终止具有更有利的想法,与拒绝那些拒绝的人的三重试验,颈部半透明和超声摄取有关。同样地,更倾向于中止怀孕的阿拉伯人越来越多地使用Nuchal半透明和超声波与那些拒绝测试的可能性。由于对产前试验结果的偏好是多方面的,并且根据人群组而变化,更好地了解制定测试选择所涉及的因素可以帮助缓解决策过程。影响声明这项主题所知的内容是什么?接受产前筛查测试的选择受各种决定因素的影响,包括:社会,人口统计和情绪因素,这些因素因文化偏好而异。实际上,女性在估算测试时,延伸超越理性(客观)推理的主观的信念和价值观。然后,它可能是,产前测试选择可能是影响的,受到实际风险状况的影响较少,更像情绪因素。虽然后者更有可能是可修改的,因此影响感知的变化,心理暴露对遗传测试背景下的决策过程的影响,特别是在以色列犹太人和阿拉伯人之间的决策过程。这项研究结果添加了什么?目前的研究通过解决与具有不同档案(以色列犹太人和阿拉伯人)的个体的实际测试中的评价性信念和情感因素的作用来解决评价性信仰和情绪因素的作用。澄清的是,背景因素和心理看法,例如对筛查的支持和愿意进行堕胎的愿望,与产前试验摄取有关。同时,这些涉及可能难以近似的密集决策实践,因为文化环境和个人偏好通常会对意向测试产生影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号