...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of midwifery & women's health >The Scope of Midwifery Practice Regulations and the Availability of the Certified Nurse‐Midwifery and Certified Midwifery Workforce, 2012‐2016
【24h】

The Scope of Midwifery Practice Regulations and the Availability of the Certified Nurse‐Midwifery and Certified Midwifery Workforce, 2012‐2016

机译:助产法规规定的范围及认证护士助产和经过认证的助产服务,2012-2016

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction Studies have linked midwifery practice laws to the availability of midwives but have generally not related workforce data to potential demand for reproductive health services. We examined state regulatory structure for midwives and its relationship to midwifery distribution and vital statistics data at the state and county level. Methods Midwifery distribution data came from the Area Health Resources Files, distribution of women of reproductive age came from the US Census, and birth statistics came from US Natality Files from 2012 to 2016. Midwifery regulations were drawn from American College of Nurse‐Midwives Annual Reports. We used bivariate analysis to examine the relationship between state midwifery practice regulations and the number of midwives available in states and counties to potentially meet women's health care needs. Results Twenty states and the District of Columbia had autonomous practice regulatory frameworks, whereas 24 states had collaborative practice regulatory frameworks during the years between 2012 and 2016. Six states changed regulations during that period. In 2016, the number of midwife‐attended births per number of midwives in a state was not related to the regulatory framework. However, states with autonomous frameworks had 2.2 times as many midwives per women of reproductive age ( P .0001) and 2.3 times as many midwives per total births when compared with states with collaborative statutory frameworks ( P .0001). At the county level, 70.1% of US counties had no midwife. Of those states with autonomous practice, only 59.7% of counties had no midwives, compared with 74.1% in states with collaborative models ( P .0001). Discussion Midwives have the potential to help address the shortage of maternity and reproductive health service providers. Our research suggests that increasing the number of states with autonomous regulatory frameworks can be one way to expand access to care for women in the United States.
机译:介绍研究将助产实践法与助产士的可用性联系起来,但一般与潜在对生殖健康服务的需求无关。我们在国家和县级审查了助产士的国家监管结构及其与助产分布和重要统计数据的关系。方法助产分布数据来自地区健康资源文件,生殖时代妇女的分布来自美国人口普查,出生统计数据来自2012年至2016年的美国纳税人档案。从美国护士助产士学院筹集了助产法规年度报告。我们使用了双方分析来检查国家助产实践法规与各国和县中可用的助产人数之间的关系,以潜在符合妇女的医疗保健需求。结果二十个州和哥伦比亚地区有自主实践监管框架,而24个州在2012年和2016年期间有合作实践监管框架。六个国家在该期间改变了法规。 2016年,国内助产士的助产士诞生人数与国家营业框架无关。然而,与具有协作法定框架的国家相比,自主框架的各国有2.2倍,每个妇女的生殖年龄(P&LT; .0001)和每分娩时的许多助产率的2.3倍(P& .0001)。在县级,70.1%的美国县没有助产士。在具有自主实践的国家,只有59.7%的县没有助产士,而具有协作模型的国家(P <.0001)的州的74.1%。讨论助产士有可能有助于解决产妇和生殖健康服务提供商的短缺。我们的研究表明,增加自主监管框架的国家数量可以是扩大对美国女性护理的人的一种方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号