首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences >Multinational validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition pancreatic cancer staging system in a pancreas head cancer cohort
【24h】

Multinational validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition pancreatic cancer staging system in a pancreas head cancer cohort

机译:癌症8世纪癌症癌症癌症癌症癌症癌症群组癌症队综合委员会跨国核算

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Abstract Background The aim of the present study was to compare the 7th and 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer ( AJCC) staging system for pancreas head cancer and to validate the 8th edition using three multinational tertiary center data. Methods Data of 2,864 patients with pancreas head cancer were collected from Korea (571), Japan (824), and the USA (1,469). Survival analysis was performed to compare the 7th and 8th editions. Validation was performed by log‐rank tests and test for trend repeated 1,000 times with random sets. Results In the 7th edition, 4.1%, 3.1%, 18.6%, 67.5%, 3.6%, and 3.1% were stage IA , IB , IIA , IIB , III , and IV . In the 8th edition, 8.8%, 13.9%, 3.1%, 38.2%, 32.9%, and 3.1% were stage IA , IB , IIA , IIB , III , and IV , respectively. The change in T category downstaged 459 patients from IIA to the new IA and IB . The new N2 category upstaged 856 patients from the former IIB to III . The 7th edition reversely stratified IA and IB . The 8th edition corrected this mis‐stratification of the 7th edition, but lacked discriminatory power between IB and IIA ( P = 0.271). Validation using the log‐rank showed that the 8th edition provided better discrimination in 6.387 test sets among 10 tests. The test for trend validated the 8th edition to stratify stages in correct order more often (7.815/10). Conclusion The 8th edition provides more even distribution with more powerful discrimination compared to the 7th edition.
机译:摘要背景本研究的目的是比较美国癌症(AJCC)癌症委员会的第7和第8版本,用于使用三个跨国三级中心数据验证第8版。方法从韩国(571),日本(824)和美国(1,469)收集2,864例胰腺头癌患者的数据。进行生存分析以比较第7和第8版。验证是通过日志排名测试执行的,并对趋势测试重复1000次,随机集。结果第7版,4.1%,3.1%,18.6%,67.5%,3.6%和3.1%是阶段,IB,IIA,IIB,III和IV。在第8版,8.8%,13.9%,3.1%,38.2%,32.9%和3.1%分别为阶段,IB,IIA,IIB,III和IV。 T型秋季田间秋季秋季的变化来自IIA和新IA和IB的患者。新的N2类别向前856名从前IIB到III患者。第7版逆转分层IA和IB。第8版纠正了第七版的这种错误分层,但缺乏IB和IIa之间的歧视力(P = 0.271)。使用日志排名验证显示第8版在10个测试中提供6.387测试集中的更好歧视。趋势的测试验证了第8版,以正确的顺序定分(7.815 / 10)。结论第8版提供了与第7版相比更强大的歧视的均匀分布。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号