首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neurotrauma >Effects of Activity-Based Therapy Interventions on Mobility, Independence, and Quality of Life for People with Spinal Cord Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Effects of Activity-Based Therapy Interventions on Mobility, Independence, and Quality of Life for People with Spinal Cord Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:基于活性的治疗干预对脊髓损伤人员的流动,独立性和生活质量的影响:系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to review the literature about the effects of activity-based therapy (ABT) interventions on mobility, functional independence, and quality of life for people with a spinal cord injury (SCI). A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized trials was performed, including adults with a non-progressive SCI at any level. The intervention of interest was ABT, defined as any intervention that sought to improve muscle activation or sensory function below the level of injury in the spinal cord and does not rely on compensatory mechanisms for improving function. The comparison was either no intervention or conventional physical interventions targeted to regions above the level of injury. The outcome measures were quality-of-life questionnaires, mobility assessments, and functional independence scales. Nineteen trials were included in this systematic review. Three compared ABT to no intervention and 16 to conventional physical rehabilitation. The methodological quality of the trials was assessed using the PEDro scale as moderate. Six studies investigated the effects of ABT interventions for the upper limbs, 11 investigated gait-related interventions, and two applied multi-modal interventions. Compared with no intervention, the meta-analysis found that ABT was not more effective for improving independence or lower limb mobility, but conferred a large positive effect on upper limb function. Compared with conventional physical interventions, there was no significant effect of ABT on lower limb mobility, independence, or quality of life; however, it had positive effects on upper limbs. In conclusion, there is evidence that ABT can improve independence and functional ability when applied to the upper limbs in people with SCI. However, it is not superior to conventional physical interventions when applied to the lower limbs.
机译:本研究的目的是审查关于活性的治疗(ABT)干预对脊髓损伤(SCI)的人们对移动性,功能独立和生活质量的影响的文献。对随机和非随机试验进行了荟萃分析的系统审查,包括任何水平的成年人。感兴趣的干预是ABT,定义为任何旨在改善脊髓损伤水平的肌肉活化或感官功能的任何干预,并且不依赖于改善功能的补偿机制。比较无论是没有针对损伤程度的地区的干预或常规物理干预。结果措施是生活质量问卷调查问卷,流动性评估和功能独立尺度。 19项试验中包含在该系统审查中。三个比较ABT无干预和16至常规物理康复。使用PEDRO Scale评估试验的方法论质量作为中度。六项研究调查了ABT干预对上肢的效果,11例研究了与相关的干预措施以及两种应用的多模态干预措施。与无干预相比,Meta分析发现,ABT对改善独立或下肢移动性并不更有效,但对上肢功能赋予了大的积极作用。与传统的物理干预相比,ABT对肢体流动性,独立性或生活质量没有显着影响;然而,它对上肢具有积极影响。总之,有证据表明,当施用于SCI的人们的人们身上时,ABT可以提高独立和功能能力。然而,当施加到下肢时,它不优于传统的物理干预。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号