首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neurotrauma >Toward a New Multi-Dimensional Classification of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research for Traumatic Brain Injury Study
【24h】

Toward a New Multi-Dimensional Classification of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research for Traumatic Brain Injury Study

机译:对创伤性脑损伤的新多维分类:创伤性脑损伤研究的协同欧洲神经统治效果研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is currently classified as mild, moderate, or severe TBI by trichotomizing the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). We aimed to explore directions for a more refined multidimensional classification system. For that purpose, we performed a hypothesis-free cluster analysis in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research for TBI (CENTER-TBI) database: a European all-severity TBI cohort (n = 4509). The first building block consisted of key imaging characteristics, summarized using principal component analysis from 12 imaging characteristics. The other building blocks were demographics, clinical severity, secondary insults, and cause of injury. With these building blocks, the patients were clustered into four groups. We applied bootstrap resampling with replacement to study the stability of cluster allocation. The characteristics that predominantly defined the clusters were injury cause, major extracranial injury, and GCS. The clusters consisted of 1451, 1534, 1006, and 518 patients, respectively. The clustering method was quite stable: the proportion of patients staying in one cluster after resampling and reclustering was 97.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 85.6-99.9%). These clusters characterized groups of patients with different functional outcomes: from mild to severe, 12%, 19%, 36%, and 58% of patients had unfavorable 6 month outcome. Compared with the mild and the upper intermediate cluster, the lower intermediate and the severe cluster received more key interventions. To conclude, four types of TBI patients may be defined by injury mechanism, presence of major extracranial injury and GCS. Describing patients according to these three characteristics could potentially capture differences in etiology and care pathways better than with GCS only.
机译:创伤性脑损伤(TBI)目前通过三分调整Glasgow Coma Scale(GCS)归类为轻度,中度或严重的TBI。我们旨在探索更精致的多维分类系统的方向。为此目的,我们对TBI(Centr-TBI)数据库的协同欧洲神经统计学效果研究进行了假设的聚类分析:欧洲全身性TBI队列(n = 4509)。第一构建块包括使用12成像特性的主要成分分析总结。另一个建筑物是人口统计,临床严重程度,次要侮辱和伤害原因。通过这些结构块,患者将患者聚集成四组。我们使用替换应用Bootstrap重新采样,以研究集群分配的稳定性。主要定义群集的特征是损伤导致,主要的颅外损伤和GCS。群集分别为1451,1534,1006和518名患者。聚类方法非常稳定:重新采样和重振后,在一个簇中停留的患者的比例为97.4%(95%置信区间[CI]:85.6-99.9%)。这些群集表征了不同功能结果的患者组:从轻度到严重,12%,19%,36%和58%的患者的患者有不利的6个月结果。与温和和上中间簇相比,较低的中间体和严重簇接受了更多的关键干预。为了得出结论,四种类型的TBI患者可以通过损伤机制,具有主要颅损伤和GCS的存在来定义。根据这三种特征描述患者可能会捕获比仅与GCS更好的病因和护理途径的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号