首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine. >Outcomes of endoscopic discectomy compared with open microdiscectomy and tubular microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniations: a meta-analysis
【24h】

Outcomes of endoscopic discectomy compared with open microdiscectomy and tubular microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniations: a meta-analysis

机译:与腰椎椎间盘突出症的开放微量微量切除术和管状微药片相比,内窥镜点切除术的结果:META分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE Endoscopic discectomy (ED) has been advocated as a less-invasive alternative to open microdiscectomy (OM) and tubular microdiscectomy (TM) for lumbar disc herniations, with the potential to decrease postoperative pain and shorten recovery times. Large-scale, objective comparisons of outcomes between ED, OM, and TM, however, are lacking. The authors' objective in this study was to conduct a meta-analysis comparing outcomes of ED, OM, and TM.
机译:目的内镜点切除术(ED)已被提倡作为腰椎椎间盘突出的微药片切除术(OM)和管状微药片(TM)的缺乏侵袭性替代品,有可能降低术后疼痛和缩短恢复时间。 然而,缺乏ED,OM和TM之间的大规模,客观比较。 本研究中的作者目的是进行ED,OM和TM的荟萃分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号