...
首页> 外文期刊>The TQM Journal >A study of the balancing of lean thinking and stakeholder salience in decision-making
【24h】

A study of the balancing of lean thinking and stakeholder salience in decision-making

机译:决策中精益思维与利益相关者显着性的平衡研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose - This research brings together two streams of thought applied to decision-making: lean thinking and stakeholder theory. Both have been identified as ways to improve organizational value. Previous studies disagree regarding whether they can work together. This study investigates if managers balance stakeholders and lean thinking in decision-making. Design/methodology/approach - This research investigates if both lean thinking and stakeholder salience share common literature by using data mining. It surveys organizations that perceive themselves as lean and have multiple diverse stakeholders to determine whether waste and salience are considered when making decisions. An ANOVA is done to see if organization type, management level, organization size, geographic location, or lean maturity has an effect on the priority of stakeholder salience or lean thinking's waste variants when making decisions. Findings - Findings of this research are: 1) stakeholders salience criteria are considered more often than lean thinking's waste variants in decision-making by managers as a whole and in particular by middle-level managers and senior managers. However, lean thinking's waste variants are considered as often as stakeholder salience criteria by first-line managers. 2) The ranking of stakeholder salience in making decisions is not affected by organization type, respondent position, organization size, perceived lean experience, or geographic location. The organization type, organization size, lean experience, and location do not affect the ranking of lean thinking variants either. But the ranking of lean thinking's waste variants is significantly different for first-line, middle-level, and senior managers. Middle-level managers rank lean thinking higher than that of either first-line or senior-level. Because of this, middle managers have a more balanced approach in using lean thinking and stakeholder salience than other managers. 3) Stakeholder salience criteria have a significantly higher ranking than lean thinking variants in making decisions for all organization types: manufacturing and nonmanufacturing. Originality/Value - This research demonstrates a significant disconnect exists between lean thinking and demands of stakeholders that impacts the value of an organization, and only middle-level managers bring balance and awareness of both streams of thought. An empirical instrument has been developed to balance the stakeholder salience criteria with the lean thinking variants.
机译:目的 - 这项研究汇集了两种思路,适用于决策:精益思维和利益相关者理论。两者都被确定为改善组织价值的方法。以前的研究不同意他们是否可以共同努力。本研究调查了管理人员平衡利益相关者和决策中的精益思维。设计/方法/方法 - 本研究调查了精益思想和利益相关者蓬勃发展,通过使用数据挖掘份额普通文学。它调查将自己视为精益的组织,并有多个不同的利益相关者,以确定在做出决定时是否考虑过浪费和显着性。完成ANOVA以了解组织类型,管理水平,组织规模,地理位置或精益成熟是否对制定决策时的利益相关者Pariences或精益思维的废物变体的优先事项。调查结果 - 这项研究的结果是:1)利益相关者显着标准比精益思想的废物变量更常见于管理人员作为整体决策,特别是中级经理和高级管理人员。然而,精益思维的废物变体被一线经理被认为是利益相关者蓬蓬莱标准的。 2)制定决策的利益攸关方显着性的排名不受组织类型,受访者立场,组织规模,感知精益经验或地理位置的影响。组织类型,组织规模,精益体验以及位置不会影响精益思维变异的排名。但是精益思维的废物变异的排名对于一线,中级和高级管理人员来说具有显着差异。中级管理人员排名瘦思想高于一线或高级的思考。正因为如此,中间经理在利用比其他管理人员使用精益思维和利益相关者显着的方法更加平衡。 3)利益相关者突出性标准的排名明显高于精益思维变体,为所有组织类型做出决定:制造和非制造。原创性/价值 - 本研究表明,利益相关者的精益思想和需求之间存在显着的脱节,影响组织的价值,只有中级管理人员带来平衡和意识,这两种思想流。已经开发了一个经验的工具,以平衡利益相关者犁头标准与精益思维变异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号