...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of mental health research in intellectual disabilities >Characteristics of Aggressive Behavior in People With Mild to Borderline Intellectual Disability and Co-Occurring Psychopathology
【24h】

Characteristics of Aggressive Behavior in People With Mild to Borderline Intellectual Disability and Co-Occurring Psychopathology

机译:轻度到临界智力疾病和共同发生精神病理学人士侵略性行为的特征

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction: People with intellectual disabilities and co-occurring psychopathology have a relatively high likelihood to engage in aggressive behavior. Nevertheless, structured clinical assessment of aggressive behavior, including when and where it occurs, is scarce in this population. Methods: On three wards specializing in the care for people with mild to borderline intellectual disability and co-occurring psychopathology, staff members completed the Staff Observation Aggression Scale-Revised adapted for people with intellectual disabilities (SOAS-R-ID) during a nine-month period, every time they witnessed aggressive behavior. Results: Based on 236 SOAS-R-ID forms, it was found that aggressive incidents were most common on Thursdays, and on two specific moments of the day (between 9-11 a.m. and 7-9 p.m.). The aggressive behavior was often exclusively of a verbal nature and was usually targeted against staff members (77.1% of the incidents). The Interclass (Pearson) Correlation Coefficient agreement between observers on the total score of the SOAS-R-ID was 0.72. Correlation between the judgment of the severity of aggressive behavior made by the staff members and the SOAS-R-ID severity scores was moderate (r = .40), but significant. Conclusions: Because aggressive behavior appeared to result often from interactions between the client and staff member or other clients, these interactions might be an important starting point for interventions. Structured clinical assessment of aggressive behavior can help to devise and test the effects of interventions. The SOAS-R-ID seems to be a clinically useful instrument and could therefore help to reduce the frequency of these incidents in the future.
机译:介绍:具有智障和共同发生的精神病理学的人们具有相对较高的可能性来实现侵略性行为。尽管如此,侵略性行为的结构化临床评估,包括其何时发生的侵略性行为,在这群人口中稀缺。方法:在三个病房上专门照顾患有轻度到边缘智力疾病和共同发生的精神病理学,工作人员完成了员工观察侵略规模修订,适用于智力残疾人(SOA-R-ID)的人员(SOA-R-ID)。一个月期,每次目睹攻击行为时。结果:基于236 SOA-R-ID表格,发现侵略性事件在周四最常见,以及当天的两项特定时刻(上午9-11至下午7-9)。侵略性行为通常完全是口头性质,通常针对工作人员(占事故77.1%)。索拉-R-ID总分比观察者之间的杂项(Pearson)相关系数协同为0.72。员工成员和SOA-R-ID严重分数攻击行为严重程度之间的相关性中等(R = .40),但很重要。结论:由于攻击行为似乎经常从客户和工作人员或其他客户之间的互动中产生,因此这些互动可能是干预措施的重要起点。侵略性行为的结构化临床评估可以帮助设计和测试干预措施的影响。 SOA-R-ID似乎是临床上有用的仪器,因此有助于降低未来这些事件的频率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号