首页> 外文期刊>Journal of memory and language >Interference patterns in subject-verb agreement and reflexives revisited: A large-sample study
【24h】

Interference patterns in subject-verb agreement and reflexives revisited: A large-sample study

机译:受试者动词协议和反身中的干扰模式重新审视:大型研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Cue-based retrieval theories in sentence processing predict two classes of interference effect: (i) Inhibitory interference is predicted when multiple items match a retrieval cue: cue-overloading leads to an overall slowdown in reading time; and (ii) Facilitatory interference arises when a retrieval target as well as a distractor only partially match the retrieval cues; this partial matching leads to an overall speedup in retrieval time. Inhibitory interference effects are widely observed, but facilitatory interference apparently has an exception: reflexives have been claimed to show no facilitatory interference effects. Because the claim is based on underpowered studies, we conducted a large-sample experiment that investigated both facilitatory and inhibitory interference. In contrast to previous studies, we find facilitatory interference effects in reflexives. We also present a quantitative evaluation of the cue-based retrieval model of Engelmann, Jager, and Vasishth (2019).
机译:句子处理中的基于CUE的检索理论预测了两类干扰效果:(i)当多个项目与检索提示匹配时预测抑制干扰:提示过载导致读取时间的总体放缓; (ii)在检索目标以及牵引力仅部分地匹配检索线索时出现促进干扰; 这种部分匹配导致检索时间的整体加速。 抑制性干扰效应被广泛观察到,但促进干扰显然具有例外:已声称没有促进干扰效应。 由于索赔基于支持的研究,所以我们进行了一个大型实验,调查了促进和抑制干扰。 与之前的研究相比,我们在反射中发现了促进的干扰效应。 我们还对Engelmann,Jager和Vasishth(2019年)的CUE的检索模型进行了定量评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号