首页> 外文期刊>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging: JMRI >Methods for the computation of templates from quantitative magnetic susceptibility maps (QSM): Toward improved atlas‐ and voxel‐based analyses (VBA)
【24h】

Methods for the computation of templates from quantitative magnetic susceptibility maps (QSM): Toward improved atlas‐ and voxel‐based analyses (VBA)

机译:从定量磁化率图计算模板的方法(QSM):朝向改善的基于阿特拉斯和体素的分析(VBA)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose To develop and assess a method for the creation of templates for voxel‐based analysis (VBA) and atlas‐based approaches using quantitative magnetic susceptibility mapping (QSM). Materials and Methods We studied four strategies for the creation of magnetic susceptibility brain templates, derived as successive extensions of the conventional template generation (CONV) based on only T 1 ‐weighted ( T 1 w) images. One method that used only T 1 w images involved a minor improvement of CONV (U‐CONV). One method used only magnetic susceptibility maps as input for template generation (DIRECT), and the other two used a linear combination of susceptibility and T 1 w images (HYBRID) and an algorithm that directly used both image modalities (MULTI), respectively. The strategies were evaluated in a group of N ?=?10 healthy human subjects and semiquantitatively assessed by three experienced raters. Template quality was compared statistically via worth estimates (WEs) obtained with a log‐linear Bradley‐Terry model. Results The overall quality of the templates was better for strategies including both susceptibility and T 1 w contrast (MULTI: WE?=?0.62; HYBRID: WE?=?0.21), but the best method depended on the anatomical region of interest. While methods using only one modality resulted in lower WEs, lowest overall WEs were obtained when only T 1 w images were used (DIRECT: WE?=?0.12; U‐CONV: WE?=?0.05). Conclusion Template generation strategies that employ only magnetic susceptibility contrast or both magnetic susceptibility and T 1 w contrast produce templates with the highest quality. The optimal approach depends on the anatomical structures of interest. The established approach of using only T 1 w images (CONV) results in reduced image quality compared to all other approaches studied. Level of Evidence: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;46:1474–1484.
机译:目的要开发和评估用于创建基于体素的分析(VBA)和基于ATLAS的方法的模板的方法(QSM)。材料和方法我们研究了磁化率脑模板创建的四种策略,基于仅基于T 1 -weigution(T 1 W)图像的传统模板生成(CONV)的连续扩展。仅使用T 1 W图像的一种方法涉及CONV(U-CHAR)的轻微改进。一种方法仅使用磁敏感性图作为模板生成的输入(直接),另一两个使用了分别直接使用两种图像模态(多)的线性组合和T 1 W图像(混合)和算法。在一组N?= 10 = 10个健康的人类受试者中评价策略,并通过三种经验的评估者进行半定量评估。模板质量在统计上进行比较,通过使用对数线性Bradley-Terry模型获得的值得估计(WES)。结果模板的整体质量更好地策略,包括敏感性和T 1 W对比(多:我们?= 0.62;杂交:我们?=?0.21),但最佳方法依赖于兴趣解剖区域。虽然仅使用一个模态的方法导致较低的WE,但是当使用T 1 W图像时获得最低总体WES(直接:我们?=?0.12; U-Char:我们?=?0.05)。结论仅使用磁化率对比或磁化率和T 1 W的模板生成策略产生具有最高质量的模板。最佳方法取决于感兴趣的解剖结构。与所研究的所有其他方法相比,使用仅T 1 W图像(CONV)的建立方法导致图像质量降低。证据水平:2技术疗效:第1阶段J. MANG。恢复。 2017年成像; 46:1474-1484。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号