...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of infusion nursing: the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society >Routine Versus Clinically Indicated Short Peripheral Catheter Replacement - An Evidence-based Practice Project
【24h】

Routine Versus Clinically Indicated Short Peripheral Catheter Replacement - An Evidence-based Practice Project

机译:常规与临床表明的短周围导管替换 - 基于证据的实践项目

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Despite current, high-quality; level 1 evidence that supports clinically indicated short peripheral catheter (SPC) replacement, the current practice in the health care system studied was to change SPCs routinely every 96 hours. A before-and-after design was used to evaluate the impact of SPC replacement when clinically indicated. Following the practice change, there were no SPC-related infections, monthly phlebitis rates ranged from 1.9% to 3.5%, and SPC use decreased by 14.2%, resulting in estimated cost savings of $2100 and 70 hours of nursing time saved. The translation of evidence on timing of SPC replacement into practice was a success.
机译:尽管最新,高质量; 第1级证据支持临床表明的短周围导管(SPC)更换,所研究的医疗保健系统的目前的做法是每96小时常规改变SPC。 在临床指示时使用前后设计来评估SPC更换的影响。 在实践变革之后,没有SPC相关的感染,每月痰炎率范围为1.9%至3.5%,SPC使用减少了14.2%,导致估计节省2100美元和70小时的护理时间。 关于SPC更换实践时机的证据的翻译是成功。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号