...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta acustica united with acustica >The Sound Power as a Reference for Sound Strength (G), Speech Level (L) and Support (ST): Uncertainty of Laboratory and In-Situ Calibration
【24h】

The Sound Power as a Reference for Sound Strength (G), Speech Level (L) and Support (ST): Uncertainty of Laboratory and In-Situ Calibration

机译:声功率作为声强(G),语音水平(L)和支持(ST)的参考:实验室和现场校准的不确定性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Some room acoustic parameters require the sound power of the sound source. The Sound Strength G uses the free field sound pressure level at 10 meters distance as a reference value. Speech intelligibility parameters like the A-weighted Speech Level, L-p,L-A,L-S,L-4m, and the Speech Transmission Index, STI, can require an absolute source level defined at 1 m distance from the sound source. The Early and Late Support parameters use the sound level at 1 m distance as a reference level. In this paper, all proposed methods to obtain the sound power level for room acoustic applications are investigated, using various omnidirectional sound sources with a dodecahedron shape containing 12 loudspeakers. It is shown that, for octave bands 250 to 8,000 Hz, the sound power can be determined with 0.8 dB uncertainty when using precision methods (diffuse field, intensity or free field). Alternative laboratory calibration methods, that only measure in a single plane of the sound source, show deviations up to 2 dB per octave band. Different stepwise rotational averages, used in such a single plane free field method, have been investigated. It can be concluded, that the uncertainty is significantly reduced only when using 12.5 degree steps (ISO 3382-1) and when using equal-angular rotations with 5 or 7 steps. Furthermore, the uncertainty of in-situ calibration has been investigated. A comparison of results from different researchers shows that a correction factor should be applied to correct the in-situ calibration for its deviation from the laboratory calibration. For each calibration method the uncertainty is presented. Results show that some methods might be sufficiently accurate to be able to measure single number ratings for G, ST, L-p,L-A,L-S,L-4m, and STI with an uncertainty in the order of magnitude of 1 JND, provided that no other measurement errors are introduced in the measurement chain.
机译:某些室内声学参数需要声源的声功率。声强G使用10米距离处的自由场声压级作为参考值。语音清晰度参数(例如A加权语音级别L-p,L-A,L-S,L-4m和语音传输索引STI)可能需要在距声源1 m的距离处定义绝对声源级别。早期和后期支持参数将1 m距离处的声级用作参考声级。在本文中,使用具有12个扬声器的十二面体形状的各种全向声源,研究了所有提出的用于获得室内声学应用声功率级的方法。结果表明,对于250至8,000 Hz的八度音阶,使用精确方法(扩散场,强度或自由场)时,声功率可以0.8 dB的不确定度确定。仅在声源的单个平面中进行测量的替代实验室校准方法,每个八度音阶的偏差高达2 dB。已经研究了在这种单平面自由场方法中使用的不同的逐步旋转平均值。可以得出结论,仅当使用12.5度步长(ISO 3382-1)以及使用等角旋转5步或7步时,不确定性才会显着降低。此外,已经研究了原位校准的不确定性。来自不同研究人员的结果比较表明,应使用校正因子来校正就地校准与实验室校准之间的偏差。对于每种校准方法,都会显示不确定性。结果表明,某些方法可能足够准确,能够测量G,ST,Lp,LA,LS,L-4m和STI的单个数额定值,其不确定性约为1 JND,前提是没有其他方法在测量链中引入了测量误差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号