首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals >An evaluation of human ADME and mass balance studies using regular or low doses of radiocarbon
【24h】

An evaluation of human ADME and mass balance studies using regular or low doses of radiocarbon

机译:使用常规或低剂量的radioCarbon评估人类Adme和质量平衡研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

There has been increased interest in conducting human absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) studies with low doses (up to 0.1?MBq) as opposed to regular doses (1.85–3.7?MBq) of radiocarbon ( 14 C). This is due to the fact that low‐dose human ADME studies may be conducted without dosimetry calculations and will lead to lower human radiation exposure. Here, we sought to compare the outcomes of low‐dose versus regular‐dose human ADME studies in healthy volunteers. Forty oral human ADME studies conducted at PRA were surveyed, among which 12 were low‐dose studies. The fraction of drug material absorbed was 67%?±?7% in the regular‐dose studies (data for 13 studies) versus 39%?±?16% in the low‐dose studies (data for 5 studies). The average total recovery of 14 C in excreta was 93%?±?5% for regular‐dose studies, and 21 of 28 such studies showed recoveries more than 90%. For low‐dose studies, average total recovery was 89%?±?9%, and 6 of 12 studies showed recoveries more than 90%. Metabolite profiling was successful in all cases reported (13 regular‐dose studies and 5 low‐dose studies). There was no obvious relationship between the total recoveries of 14 C in excreta and the proportion of 14 C excreted in feces, or between the total recoveries and the plasma elimination half‐lives for parent or total 14 C, neither in the low‐dose nor the regular‐dose studies. A significant correlation was found between the fraction absorbed and the recovery in feces in the low‐dose but not in the regular‐dose studies, and no correlation was found between the fractions absorbed and the total recoveries in both types of studies. Low‐dose studies were more often conducted on drugs that had a plasma elimination half‐life of parent drug more than 100?hours (5 of 12 studies) than regular‐dose studies (1 of 26 studies). We conclude that both low‐dose as well as regular‐dose human ADME studies provide adequate data to support decision making for further drug development.
机译:由于常规剂量(1.85-3.7μmbq)的radiocarbon(14c),已经有较低的人类吸收,分布,新陈代谢和排泄(Adme)研究的兴趣增加了(高达0.1μmbq)的兴趣。这是由于可以在没有剂量测定计算的情况下进行低剂量人类ADME研究,并且会导致人的辐射暴露降低。在这里,我们寻求比较健康志愿者的低剂量与常规剂量人类Adme研究的结果。调查了在PRA进行的四十个口服ADME研究,其中12项是低剂量研究。在常规剂量研究(13项研究数据中,吸收的药物材料的级分为67%?±7%,低剂量研究中的39%?±16%(5项研究数据)。对于常规剂量研究,排泄物14℃的平均总回收率为93%?±5%,21个这样的研究显示超过90%的回收率。对于低剂量研究,平均总回收率为89%?±9%,12项研究中的6项显示出现超过90%的回收率。在报告的所有病例中,代谢物分析成功(13项常规研究和5种低剂量研究)。在排泄物中14℃的总回收率之间没有明显的关系,并且在粪便中排出的14℃的比例,或在总回收率和血浆消除半衰期之间,父母或总为14℃,既不是低剂量也不是常规剂量研究。在吸收的级分和低剂量中的粪便中恢复但不在常规剂量研究中的级数之间发现了显着的相关性,并且在吸收的级分和两种类型研究中的总回收率之间没有发现相关性。低剂量研究更常见于血浆消除父毒药物的半衰期超过100μm(12项研究中的5个)的药物的药物,而不是常规剂量研究(26项研究中的1个)。我们得出结论,低剂量以及常规剂量的人类ADME研究提供了足够的数据,以支持进一步的药物开发的决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号