首页> 外文期刊>Journal of interprofessional care >The intersection of professionalism and interprofessional care: development and initial testing of the interprofessional professionalism assessment (IPA)
【24h】

The intersection of professionalism and interprofessional care: development and initial testing of the interprofessional professionalism assessment (IPA)

机译:专业和思想侦查的交点:思想职业主义评估的发展与初步测试(IPA)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Valid assessment of interprofessional education and collaborative practice (IPECP) is challenging. The number of instruments that measure various aspects of IPECP, or in various sites is growing, however. The Interprofessional Professionalism Assessment (IPA) measures observable behaviors of health care professionals-in-training that demonstrate professionalism and collaboration when working with other health care providers in the context of people-centered care. The IPA instrument was created by the Interprofessional Professionalism Collaborative (IPC), a national group representing 12 entry-level health professions and one medical education assessment organization. The instrument was created and evaluated over several years through a comprehensive, multi-phasic process: 1) development of construct and observable behaviors, 2) instrument design, expert review and cognitive interviews, and 3) psychometric testing. The IPA contains 26 items representing six domains of professionalism (altruism and caring, excellence, ethics, respect, communication, accountability), and was tested by 233 preceptors rating health profession learners in the final year of their practical training. These preceptors represented 30 different academic institutions across the U.S., worked in various types of practice sites, and evaluated learners representing 10 different entry-level health professions. Exploratory factor analysis suggested four factors (communication, respect, excellence, altruism and caring) using 21 items with the least amount of missing data, and confirmed, for the most part, a priori expectations. Internal consistency reliability coefficients for the entire instrument and its four subscales were high (all greater than 0.9). Psychometric results demonstrate aspects of the IPAs reliability and validity and its use across multiple health professions and in various practice sites.
机译:有效评估对争议教育和协作实践(IPECP)的挑战。然而,衡量IPECP的各个方面,或各种网站的仪器数量正在增长。审查专业主义评估(IPA)衡量卫生保健专业人员的可观察行为,培训培训,在以人为本的护理环境中与其他医疗保健提供者合作时,展示了专业和合作。 IPA仪器是由代表12个入门卫生专业和一个医学教育评估组织的国家集团的辩论专业主义协作(IPC)创作。通过全面,多相过程:1)制定结构和可观察行为的发展,2)仪器设计,专家审查和认知访谈,以及3)仪器设计,专家审查和认知访谈以及3)仪器。 IPA含有26项,代表专业六个专业主义(利他主义和关怀,卓越,道德,尊重,沟通,责任),并在其实际培训的最后一年中由233个雷维斯坦评级卫生职业学习者进行测试。这些备注者在美国跨过美国专业的30个不同的学术机构,并在各种类型的实践网站上工作,并评估了代表10个不同入门级健康专业的学习者。探索性因素分析建议使用21项具有最少缺失数据的21项的四个因素(沟通,尊重,卓越,利他主义和关怀),并且在大多数情况下确认了先前期望。整个仪器的内部一致性可靠性系数,其四个分量高(全部大于0.9)。心理测量结果展示了IPAS可靠性和有效性的各个方面,并且在多种健康专业和各种练习网站上使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号