首页> 外文期刊>Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology: an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing >Atrial resynchronization therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure with and without systolic left ventricular dysfunction: a pilot study
【24h】

Atrial resynchronization therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure with and without systolic left ventricular dysfunction: a pilot study

机译:心房颤动和心脏病患者的心房重新同步治疗和无收缩左心室功能障碍:试验研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background We examined the long-term (≥?5?years) outcomes of dual-site atrial pacing (DAP) when added to background antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) and/or ablation in patients with refractory atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF). Methods Seventy-three patients with HF (mean NYHA HF class of 2.5) and AF refractory to AADs and/or ablation were implanted with DAP systems to achieve biatrial electrical and mechanical resynchronization (ART) and rhythm control (RC). Results Thirty-eight patients with refractory AF and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and 35 with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) were enrolled. HFpEF patients had higher left ventricular ejection fraction compared to HFrEF (53?±?5 vs. 31?±?10% p ?
机译:背景技术在添加到难治性心房颤动(AF)和心力衰竭患者的患者中,我们检查了双地性心房起搏(DAP)的长期(≥1岁)的两性性心房起搏(DAP)的结果。( HF)。方法将七十三名HF患者(平均NYHA HF等级为2.5)和AADS和/或消融的AF难以实现DAP系统,以实现偏见电气和机械重新同步(ART)和节奏控制(RC)。结果纳入了38例难治性AF和HF具有保存的喷射分数(HFPEF)和35款的难治性AF和HF患者。与HFREF相比,HFPEF患者具有较高的左心室喷射分数(53?±5比,31.±10%p?<0.001)。生存中位的后续行动是9.3?年(平均9.0?年,SE 0.63),并且在亚组相似(P?= 0.127)。 DAP后,87%维持RC,在3年3年内,NYHA HF课程的改善(平均1.8)。与HFRef患者相比,RC在HFPEF中(分别为85%,p?=Δns)和肛门血管动脉和持久性分别(分别为85%,p≤x≤ns)。在HFPEF中,HFPEF的总存活率优越HFFPEF(HFPEF 75%,在5岁的HFREF中为45%,60%的HFPEF在HFREF中为10?年,P?= 0.036)。在RC患者比没有RC的患者趋势趋势(分别为5. 54%,P?= 13岁),生存趋势比没有RC的患者更好结论艺术使用DAP作为治疗添加改善的HF和在许多患者中建立了具有难治性AF的HFREF和HFPEF的长期RC。长期存活率在HFPEF中优于HFFREF。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号