首页> 外文期刊>Journal of intensive care medicine >Are Predictive Energy Expenditure Equations in Ventilated Surgery Patients Accurate?
【24h】

Are Predictive Energy Expenditure Equations in Ventilated Surgery Patients Accurate?

机译:通风手术患者的预测能耗方程是否准确?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: While indirect calorimetry (IC) is the gold standard used to calculate specific calorie needs in the critically ill, predictive equations are frequently utilized at many institutions for various reasons. Prior studies suggest these equations frequently misjudge actual resting energy expenditure (REE) in medical and mixed intensive care unit (ICU) patients; however, their utility for surgical ICU (SICU) patients has not been fully evaluated. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the REE measured by IC with REE calculated using specific calorie goals or predictive equations for nutritional support in ventilated adult SICU patients. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed on all adults (n = 419, 18-91 years) mechanically ventilated for >24 hours, with an Fio(2) <= 60%, who met IC screening criteria. Caloric needs were estimated using Harris-Benedict equations (HBEs), and 20, 25, and 30 kcal/kg/d with actual (ABW), adjusted (ADJ), and ideal body (IBW) weights. The REE was measured using IC. Results: The estimated REE was considered accurate when within +/- 10% of the measured REE by IC. The HBE, 20, 25, and 30 kcal/kg/d estimates of REE were found to be inaccurate regardless of age, gender, or weight. The HBE and 20 kcal/kg/d underestimated REE, while 25 and 30 kcal/kg/d overestimated REE. Of the methods studied, those found to most often accurately estimate REE were the HBE using ABW, which was accurate 35% of the time, and 25 kcal/kg/d ADJ, which was accurate 34% of the time. This difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Using HBE, 20, 25, or 30 kcal/kg/d to estimate daily caloric requirements in critically ill surgical patients is inaccurate compared to REE measured by IC. In SICU patients with nutrition requirements essential to recovery, IC measurement should be performed to guide clinicians in determining goal caloric requirements.
机译:背景:虽然间接量热法(IC)是用于计算批判性病中的特定卡路里需求的金标准,但由于各种原因,在许多机构中经常利用预测方程。先前的研究表明,这些方程频繁误解了医疗和混合密集型护理单元(ICU)患者的实际休息能源支出(REE);然而,他们对手术ICU(SICU)患者的效用尚未得到完全评估。因此,本研究的目的是将通过IC测量的REE与使用特定卡路里的目标或预测方程用于营养支持的预测方程来比较IC计算的REE。材料和方法:对前瞻性收集数据的回顾性审查在所有成年人(n = 419,18-91岁)上进行机械通风> 24小时,符合IC筛选标准的FIO(2)<= 60%。使用Harris-Benedict方程(HBE)和20,25和30kcal / kg / d估计热量需求,其中实际(ABW),调整(adj)和理想的身体(IBW)重量。使用IC测量REE。结果:估计的REE在IC +/- 10%的+/- 10%的IC +/- 10%内被认为是准确的。无论年龄,性别或重量如何,都发现REE的HBE,20,25和30千卡/ kg / kg / d估计是不准确的。 HBE和20 kcal / kg / d低估的ree,而25和30 kcal / kg / d高估的ree。研究了研究的方法,其中最常准确估计的REE是使用ABW的HBE,这是35%的时间,25千卡/ kg / d adj,这是34%的时间准确。这种差异没有统计学意义。结论:与IC测量的REE相比,使用HBE,20,25或30 kcal / kg / d估计严重的手术患者中的每日热性要求是不准确的。在SICU患者营养要求恢复至关重要,应进行IC测量,以指导临床医生确定目标热量要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号