首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hand and microsurgery >Comparison of Single-Dose Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block and Continuous Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Applications in the Treatment of Finger Amputations
【24h】

Comparison of Single-Dose Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block and Continuous Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Applications in the Treatment of Finger Amputations

机译:单剂量Infroadlavicular臂丛丛块和连续血管臂丛神经块应用在手指截肢中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Introduction The aim of this study is to evaluate the replantation success of single-dose infraclavicuiar brachial plexus block and continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus block (CIBPB) applied with bupivacaine and prilocaine in patients with finger amputation. Materials and Methods This prospective randomized nonblinded study was conducted between January 2012 and September 2017, and 47 patients, all male, were included. Patients were randomly separated into two groups as 23 patients CIBPB applied group (group A) and 24 patients single-dose infraclavicular block applied group (group B). In group B, after the effect of block is ceased, intravenous patient-controlled (PC) opioid analgesia and, where necessary, 1 mg/kg meperidine and 75 mg dicfofenac sodium intramuscularly were alternately administered at 4 to 6 hours intervals. The average ages were 30.7 ± 10.06 and 29 ± 9.08, respectively. Replantations were applied as being two venous anastomoses to one artery, where possible. Hourly skin temperatures of fingers of the hands in which both surgeries applied and no surgery applied in both the groups were measured for 3 days with an infrared thermometer. Also, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) evaluations in both the groups were performed in 3-hour intervals for 3 days. Results Replantations were successful in 22 patients in whom CIBPB was applied (95.6%) and in 19 patients in whom single block was applied (79.16%). Regarding the finger temperatures, no significant difference was detected between both the groups for 3 days following the operation. No significant difference was found between the length of hospital stays (4.73 ± 2.21-4.71 ± 1.53) and duration of operations (2.90 ± 0.73-2.83 ± 0.58). There was no significant difference between the temperature values of both the groups. NRS scores of group A were statistically significantly lower than those of group B. Conclusion In this prospective randomized study performed by using bupivacaine and prilocaine on 24 patients, the success rate of finger replantations with CIBPB was found to be higher. CIBPB is a very beneficial method that should be taken in consideration in hand injuries with anastomosis and high risk of vasospasm. Further studies with more number of cases would help reduce the question marks related with the success of this method.
机译:引言本研究的目的是评估单剂量型腋下臂丛丛和连续血管臂丛林(CIBPB)的重新成功,在手指截肢患者中施用Bupivacaine和Prilocaine。材料和方法该预期随机性非粘性研究在2012年1月至2017年1月至2017年9月期间进行,47名患者均包括所有男性。患者随机分为两组,分为两组CIBPB施用基团(A组)和24例单剂量Infroadlavicular嵌段施用组(B组)。在B组中,在停止嵌段的效果后,静脉内患者控制(PC)阿片类镇痛和必要时,在4至6小时的间隔时交替地施用1mg / kg meperidine和75mg dicfofenac钠。平均年龄分别为30.7±10.06和29±9.08。在可能的情况下,将重新施加为两个静脉吻合术。每小时皮肤温度的手指,其中施用的两种手术和在两组中没有施用的手术,用红外温度计测量3天。此外,两组中的数值评定量表(NRS)评价以3小时的间隔进行3天。结果在施用CIBPB的22名患者中,备注再植物(95.6%)和19例患者(79.16%)。关于手指温度,在操作后3天内,两组之间没有检测到显着差异。在医院住宿时间(4.73±2.21-4.71±1.53)和操作持续时间(2.90±0.73-2.83±0.58)之间没有显着差异。两组的温度值之间没有显着差异。 A组的NRS分数统计学显着低于B组。结论在这项前瞻性随机调查中,通过使用Bupivacaine和Prilocaine在24名患者上进行,发现用Cibpb的手指再植率更高。 CIBPB是一种非常有益的方法,应该考虑到吻合吻合和血管痉挛的高风险伤害。通过更多案例的进一步研究将有助于减少与此方法的成功相关的问号。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号