首页> 外文期刊>Digestion >Magnifying Blue Laser Imaging versus Magnifying Narrow-Band Imaging for the Diagnosis of Early Gastric Cancer: A Prospective, Multicenter, Comparative Study
【24h】

Magnifying Blue Laser Imaging versus Magnifying Narrow-Band Imaging for the Diagnosis of Early Gastric Cancer: A Prospective, Multicenter, Comparative Study

机译:放大蓝光激光成像与放大率窄带成像,用于诊断早期胃癌:前瞻性,多中心,比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background/Aims: The diagnostic efficacy of magnifying blue laser imaging (M-BLI) and M-BLI in bright mode (M-BLIbright) in the identification of early gastric cancer (EGC) was evaluated for comparison to that of magnifying narrowband imaging (M-NBI). Methods: This prospective, multicenter study evaluated 114 gastric lesions examined using M-BLI, M-BLI-bright, and M-NBI between May 2012 and November 2012; 104 EGCs were evaluated by each modality. The vessel plus surface classification system was used to evaluate the demarcation line (DL), microvascular pattern (MVP), and microsurface pattern (MSP). Results: M-BLI, MBLI- bright, and M-NBI revealed a DL for 96.1, 98.1, and 98.1% and irregular MVP for 95.1, 95.1, and 96.2% of lesions, respectively, with no significant difference. Irregular MSP was observed by M-BLI, M-BLI-bright, and M-NBI in 97.1, 90.4, and 78.8% of lesions, respectively, with significant differences (p < 0.001). The proportion of moderately differentiated ad-enocarcinoma with irregular MSP on M-BLI and absent MSP on M-NBI was significantly higher than that with irregular MSP on M-BLI and M-NBI (35.0 and 9.9%, respectively; p = 0.002). Conclusion: M-BLI and M-BLI-bright provided excellent visualization of microstructures and microvessels similar to M-NBI. Irregular MSP in a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma might be frequently visualized using M-BLI and M-BLI-bright compared with using M-NBI. (C) 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel
机译:背景/目的:将展示蓝色激光成像(M-BLI)和M-BLI在明亮的模式(M-Blibright)中的诊断效果进行评估在鉴定早期胃癌(EGC)中,与放大窄带成像( m-nbi)。方法:这项前瞻性,多中心研究评估了在2012年5月至2012年5月至2012年5月之间使用M-BLI,M-BLI-BLIGH和M-NBI检测的114胃病变;每种方式评估104个EGCS。血管加表面分类系统用于评估分界线(DL),微血管图案(MVP)和微观图案(MSP)。结果:M-BLI,MBLI-BRIGHT和M-NBI显示出96.1,98.1和98.1%的DL,分别为95.1,95.1和96.2%的病灶,没有显着差异。 M-BLI,M-BLI-BRIGHT和M-NBI分别观察到不规则的MSP,分别在97.1,90.4和78.8%的病变中观察到具有显着差异的损伤(P <0.001)。在M-NBI上具有不规则MSP的中度分化的Ad-enocarcinom瘤的比例显着高于M-BLI和M-NBI的不规则MSP(分别为35.0和9.9%; P = 0.002) 。结论:M-BLI和M-BLI-BLIGH提供了与M-NBI相似的微观结构和微孔丝的优异可视化。与使用M-NBI相比,使用M-BLI和M-BLI明亮频繁地可视化中等分化的腺癌中的不规则MSP。 (c)2017年S. Karger AG,巴塞尔

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号