...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hand therapy: Official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists >Upper limb functional capacity of working patients with osteoarthritis of the hands: A cross-sectional study
【24h】

Upper limb functional capacity of working patients with osteoarthritis of the hands: A cross-sectional study

机译:手中骨关节炎的工作患者的上肢功能能力:横截面研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Abstract Study Design A cross-sectional design was used. Introduction Little is known about the effects of osteoarthritis of the hands (OAH) on work ability in working patients with OAH. Purpose of the Study The study aimed to analyze the differences in upper limb functional capacity (ULFC) between working patients with OAH and healthy workers and to evaluate variables associated with ULFC and with self-reported disability (SRD) in working patients with OAH. Methods Forty-one patients performed the ULFC Evaluation (ULFCE) and also completed 2 SRD measures. The patients' results were compared with the ULFCE results of 82 matched healthy workers from a reference database. Three sets of multivariate regression analyses were used to reveal the predictors of ULFC and SRD. Results Patients scored 12%-45% lower on all ULFCE tests (P values ranging from P P Discussion Working patients with OAH had a considerably lower ULFC compared with healthy workers. Female gender and?the presence of OAH predicted lower ULFC. Pain and lower finger strength predicted worse scores on?SRD. Conclusion(s) In the case of professionals advising working patients with OAH, our results suggest that a?careful evaluation of the ULFC and SRD is warranted. Subsequently, advice regarding exercises or adjustments at work can be given. Level of Evidence 3b.
机译:摘要研究设计使用了横截面设计。引言很少是关于手中骨关节炎(OAH)对OAH工作患者工作能力的影响。该研究的目的是分析OAH和健康工人工作患者的上肢功能能力(ULFC)的差异,并评估与OAH的工作患者中的ULFC和自我报告的残疾(SRD)之间的变量。方法401例患者进行ULFC评估(ULFCE),也完成了2个SRD措施。将患者的结果与来自参考数据库的82个匹配的健康工人的ULFCE结果进行了比较。三组多元回归分析用于揭示ULFC和SRD的预测因子。结果患者在所有ULFCE测试中得分降低了12%-45%(PP讨论的P值与OAH的工作患者相比,与健康工人相比,ULFC相当较低的ULFC。女性性别和欧亚的存在预测ulfc。疼痛和较低的手指力量预测得分更糟糕的分数?结论在专业人员建议奥卡的工作患者的情况下,我们的结果表明,保证了对ULFC和SRD的仔细评估。随后,有关工作练习或调整的建议可以给予。证据级别3B。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号