首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Repeatability and Safety of the Functional Capacity Evaluation-One-Handed for Individuals with Upper Limb Reduction Deficiency and Amputation
【2h】

Repeatability and Safety of the Functional Capacity Evaluation-One-Handed for Individuals with Upper Limb Reduction Deficiency and Amputation

机译:单手功能能力评估的上肢复位缺损和截肢患者的可重复性和安全性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose To assess repeatability and safety of the functional capacity evaluation-one-handed (FCE-OH), a FCE-OH individuals, consisting of eight items. Method The FCE-OH protocol was administered twice to 23 individuals with upper limb absence (87% male; median age 46 years; median 2 days between sessions). To examine repeatability, test–retest reliability and agreement were assessed with the intraclass correlations coefficient (ICC) and limits of agreement (LoA), respectively. Reliability was considered acceptable when ICC-values were ≥0.75. Widths of LoA of four tests were compared with those of healthy adults. Safety and pain response were assessed with a questionnaire. Results After controlling for stability of construct, ICC-values ranged between 0.23 and 0.96, and widths of LoA ranged between 16 and 79%. Intertrial (learning) effects were present in three test items. No serious adverse reactions were reported. A pain response was reported by 30% of the participants. Conclusion Good or excellent reliability was observed in five tests, while three items showed poor or moderate test–retest reliability. Interpretation of agreement was possible for four tests, of which three showed widths of LoA similar to those reported in healthy adults. Learning effects were present; therefore, interpretation at the individual level should be performed with care. As the CI of several items were wide, confirmation of results in a larger sample is warranted. Safety was confirmed.
机译:目的评估单手功能能力评估(FCE-OH)的可重复性和安全性,该功能由8个项目组成。方法FCE-OH方案对23例上肢无肢体患者(男性87%;中位年龄46岁;中位间隔2天)进行了两次给药。为了检验可重复性,分别使用组内相关系数(ICC)和协议限制(LoA)评估了重测信度和一致性。当ICC值≥0.75时,认为可靠性是可以接受的。比较了四个测试的LoA宽度与健康成年人的LoA宽度。使用问卷调查评估安全性和疼痛反应。结果在控制了构建体的稳定性之后,ICC值在0.23至0.96之间,LoA的宽度在16%至79%之间。在三个测试项目中都存在试用(学习)效果。没有严重不良反应的报道。 30%的参与者报告了疼痛反应。结论在五项测试中观察到良好或优异的可靠性,而三项测试的重测可靠性则为差或中等。可以解释四个测试的一致性,其中三个显示的LoA宽度与健康成年人中报告的相似。存在学习效果;因此,应谨慎进行个人解释。由于几项的CI很大,因此有必要在较大样本中确认结果。安全性得到确认。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号