首页> 外文期刊>Journal of feline medicine and surgery >Serum theophylline after multiple dosing with transdermal gels in cats
【24h】

Serum theophylline after multiple dosing with transdermal gels in cats

机译:多次给药后患有透皮凝胶的血清茶碱

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives Our objectives were, first, to determine if therapeutic serum theophylline concentrations could be achieved using long-term, once-daily dosing of transdermal theophylline and, secondarily, to evaluate the difference between two transdermal theophylline formulations. Methods Seven healthy cats, 1-10 years of age, were evaluated in a two-way, randomized, double-blinded, crossover study. Participants received transdermal theophylline at 15 mg/kg for 21 days in either pluronic lecithin organogel (PLO) or Lipoderm formulation. On day 22, blood was collected 2, 6, 14 and 24 h after dosing. After a 14 day washout period, blood was collected to verify non-detectible theophylline concentrations. The alternate formulation was administered for 21 days, and sampling was repeated. Serum theophylline concentrations were determined using an automated immunoassay. Serum concentrations were compared between formulations using a two-way random-measures ANOVA and over time within a formulation using a repeated-measures ANOVA. Results Therapeutic serum theophylline concentrations were achieved for 2/7 cats in each group. Of 56 serum theophylline measurements obtained, only seven (13%) were within the therapeutic range. No significant difference was detected in drug concentrations achieved by the transdermal formulations at any time point. In addition, no significant difference in serum theophylline concentrations was noted between time points for PLO (P = 0.751) or Lipoderm (P = 0.107). Conclusions and relevance Once-daily transdermal dosing of theophylline does not reliably achieve therapeutic concentrations. Individual cats may achieve therapeutic concentrations. No significant difference was noted between PLO and Lipoderm formulations. Therefore, transdermal theophylline formulations should not be considered as a first-line therapy in feline asthma patients.
机译:目的我们的目标是首先,为了确定治疗性血清培养基浓度,可以使用长期,每日给药的透皮细胞,二次,评价两种透皮培养线制剂之间的差异。方法以双向,随机,双盲,交叉研究评估七只健康猫。参与者在Pluronic卵磷脂有机凝胶(PLO)或脂质二甲酯制剂中以15mg / kg接受透皮培养基21天。在第22天,给药后收集血液2,6,14和24小时。 14天洗涤期后,收集血液以验证无可检测的茶碱浓度。施用替代制剂21天,重复取样。使用自动免疫测定法测定血清茶碱浓度。使用双向随机测量Anova和随时间使用重复测量Anova在制剂中进行血清浓度。结果治疗血清培养细胞浓度为每组2/7猫。在56次血清茶碱测量中获得,仅在治疗范围内仅7(13%)。在任何时间点在透皮制剂中达到的药物浓度没有检测到显着差异。此外,在PLO的时间点(P = 0.751)或脂质(P = 0.107)之间没有患者血清培养基浓度的显着差异。结论和相关性一次 - 每日透皮剂量的茶碱不可靠地达到治疗浓度。个体猫可能达到治疗浓度。 PLO和Lipoderm制剂之间没有发现显着差异。因此,透皮茶碱配方不应被视为猫哮喘患者的一线治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号