首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning >Beyond argumentation: a practice-based approach to environmental policy
【24h】

Beyond argumentation: a practice-based approach to environmental policy

机译:超越论证:基于实践的环境政策方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We propose that a practice-based approach to environmental policy can help consolidate theoretical understanding of and empirical focus on practices in IPA. Doing so counteracts a tendency to privilege knowledge and discourse in IPA and environmental policy analysis. We draw on multiple strands of practice theory to inform three sensitising concepts: situated agency, logic of practice, and performativity. These concepts provide the analytical tools to investigate how social order and social change originate from the entanglement of meaning and action in practice. We illustrate these concepts by applying them to practices of community forest management in the countries of Ethiopia and Tanzania. Our analysis suggests that a practice-based approach is able to offer nuanced and empirically grounded accounts of political struggles and democratic practices. Its potential is especially strong in cases where policy-making and policy ideas and outcomes are less clearly linked to argumentative processes. We conclude by arguing for further inclusion and consolidation of practice-based approaches within the tradition of interpretive policy analysis.
机译:我们建议采用基于实践的环境政策方法,可以帮助巩固对IPA中实践的理论理解和实证关注。这样做抵消了IPA和环境政策分析中的特权知识和话语的倾向。我们利用多条实践理论,以通知三个敏感概念:位于代理机构,实践逻辑和表演。这些概念提供了分析工具来调查社会秩序和社会变革如何从实践中的意义和行动的纠缠起源。我们通过将它们应用于埃塞俄比亚国家和坦桑尼亚国家的社区森林管理实践来说明这些概念。我们的分析表明,基于实践的方法能够提供对政治斗争和民主实践的细致细微和经验的基础账户。在决策和政策思想和结果与争论流程不明确相关的情况下,它的潜力特别强劲。我们通过争论进一步纳入并巩固基于实践的方法,以在解释性政策分析的传统中争论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号