首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Engineering >Fuzzy Logic-Based Model to Predict the Impact of Flow Rate and Turbidity on the Performance of Multimedia Filters
【24h】

Fuzzy Logic-Based Model to Predict the Impact of Flow Rate and Turbidity on the Performance of Multimedia Filters

机译:基于模糊的基于逻辑模型,以预测流速和浊度对多媒体过滤器性能的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper uses fuzzy logic-based models to predict and evaluate the performance of multimedia filters utilized in wastewater treatment. A fuzzy logic-based model is constructed and trained to predict the operating time (i.e., treated volume of water) of a multimedia filter. A preset acceptable turbidity value of 5 nephelometric turbidity units (NTU) is used as the breakthrough point. The model is based on a set of experimental data with variable flow rates and influent turbidity. The results from the fuzzy-based model indicate that the simulated treated volume at different inputs of turbidity and flow rate fits the experimental results with a coefficient of multiple determination (R-2) of 91.6%. To examine the efficiency of the developed model predicting treated volume, the results obtained from the model are compared with the results obtained from a multiple linear regression model. The accuracy of prediction of both models are examined using the mean absolute error (MSE), root-mean-square error (RMSE), and R-2. The MSE, RMSE, and R-2 for the fuzzy-based model are 5,318, 72.92, and 98%, respectively, whereas for the regression model they are 3,302, 57.46, and 99%, respectively. Although the regression model appears to be more accurate, the fuzzy-based model is deemed to be more advantageous because it can incorporate the uncertainties in inputs as a result of human judgments and can indicate the errors in the outputs. (C) 2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
机译:本文采用模糊基于逻辑的模型来预测和评价废水处理中多媒体过滤器的性能。构造和培训基于模糊的基于逻辑的模型,以预测多媒体过滤器的操作时间(即,处理的水体积)。预设可接受的浊度值为5个浊度浊度单元(NTU)用作突破点。该模型基于一组具有可变流速和影响浊度的一组实验数据。基于模糊的模型的结果表明,浊度和流速不同输入的模拟处理量适合于多重测定系数(R-2)91.6%的实验结果。为了检查预测经处理体积的开发模型的效率,将从模型获得的结果与从多元线性回归模型获得的结果进行比较。使用平均绝对误差(MSE),根均方误差(RMSE)和R-2来检查两种模型的预测的准确性。模糊基础模型的MSE,RMSE和R-2分别为5,318,72.92和98%,而回归模型分别为3,302,57.46和99%。虽然回归模型似乎更准确,但基于模糊的模型被认为是更有利的,因为它可以作为人类判断中的输入中的不确定性并可以指示输出中的误差。 (c)2017美国土木工程师协会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号