首页> 外文期刊>Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : >Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice Regarding Research Ethics Committees Among Health Care Faculty at Two Public Universities in Jordan
【24h】

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice Regarding Research Ethics Committees Among Health Care Faculty at Two Public Universities in Jordan

机译:关于约旦两所公立大学的医疗教师研究伦理委员会研究伦理委员会的知识,态度和实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Human research at Jordanian universities is increasing. This descriptive cross-sectional survey assessed knowledge, attitudes, and practices concerning the procedures and review process of research ethics committees (RECs) among faculty in health sciences in two major Jordanian universities. Most faculty reported having no training in research ethics in their current institutions. Although knowledge of RECs' roles and functions was adequate, deficiencies were found regarding the advisory and monitoring roles for RECs raised in this survey. Faculty expressed concerns about levels of ethical training for members of RECs and potential conflicts of interest and bias in review process. RECs should provide ethics training for faculty, and future research should examine the functioning of the RECs in Jordan and other Middle Eastern countries.
机译:约旦大学的人类研究正在增加。 这种描述性的横断面调查评估了关于两大大学卫生科学院研究伦理委员会(RECS)的程序和审查过程的知识,态度和做法。 大多数教师报告在他们目前的机构中没有在研究伦理中没有培训。 虽然REC的角色和职能的知识是足够的,但就本次调查中提出的RECS的咨询和监测角色提供了缺陷。 教师对审查过程中的康复团体和潜在的利益冲突和偏见冲突的伦理培训水平的担忧表示担忧。 REC应该为教师提供伦理培训,未来的研究应该审查约旦和其他中东国家的REC的运作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号