...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Epidemiology >Studies on drug switchability showed heterogeneity in methodological approaches: a scoping review
【24h】

Studies on drug switchability showed heterogeneity in methodological approaches: a scoping review

机译:药物可切换性的研究表明,方法论方法中的异质性:范围审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background and ObjectiveSeveral drugs share the same therapeutic indication, including those undergoing patent expiration. Concerns on the interchangeability are frequent in clinical practice, challenging the evaluation of switchability through observational research. The objective of this study was to conduct a scoping review of observational studies on drug switchability to identify methodological strategies adopted to deal with bias and confounding. MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science (updated January 31, 2017) to identify studies evaluating switchability in terms of effectiveness/safety outcomes or compliance. Three reviewers independently screened studies extracting all characteristics. Strategies to address confounding, particularly previous drug use and switching reasons, were considered. All findings were summarized in descriptive analyses. ResultsThirty-two studies, published in the last 10?years, met the inclusion criteria. Epilepsy, cardiovascular, and rheumatology were the most frequently represented clinical areas. Seventy-five percent of the studies reported data on effectiveness/safety outcomes. The most frequent study design was cohort (65.6%) followed by case–control (21.9%) and self-controlled (12.5%). Case–control and case–crossover studies showed homogeneous methodological strategies to deal with bias and confounding. Among cohort studies, the confounding associated with previous drug use was addressed introducing variables in multivariate model (47.3%) or selecting only adherent patients (14.3%). Around 30% of cohort studies did not report reasons for switching. In the remaining 70%, clinical parameters or previous occurrence of outcomes was measured to identify switching connected with lack of effectiveness or adverse events. ConclusionThis study represents a starting point for researchers and administrators who are approaching the investigation and assessment of issues related to interchangeability of drugs.
机译:背景和客观的药物分享相同的治疗迹象,包括接受专利到期的人。对临床实践中常规性频繁的担忧,通过观察研究挑战可切换性评估。本研究的目的是对药物可切换性的观察研究进行审查,以确定采用偏见和混杂的方法论策略。方法网络搜索PubMed,Embase和Science Web(2017年1月31日更新),以识别在有效/安全结果或遵守方面评估可切换性的研究。三家综述人员独立筛查研究提取所有特征。考虑了解决混淆,特别是先前的药物使用和转换原因的策略。所有调查结果都在描述性分析中总结了。结果在过去的10年出版的研究结果 - 年份,达到了纳入标准。癫痫,心血管和风湿病是最常见的临床区域。百分之七十五的研究报告了有关有效性/安全结果的数据。最常见的研究设计是队列(65.6%),然后是案例控制(21.9%)和自我控制(12.5%)。案例控制和案例交叉研究表明,处理偏见和混淆的均匀方法策略。在队列研究中,与先前药物使用相关的混淆是解决了多元模型(47.3%)中的变量(47.3%)或仅选择粘附患者(14.3%)。约30%的队列研究没有报告切换的原因。在其余70%的70%中,测量临床参数或先前发生的结果,以确定与缺乏有效性或不良事件相关的切换。结论本研究代表了研究人员和管理员的起点,他正在接近调查和评估与药物互换性相关的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号